Weak argument. Sure, I think Kawhi Leonard can guard a bigger Lebron James, but I don't know if I want him guarding Yao F'ing Ming. Come on Weak argument
Basketball != football
Being serious. Does Bookie's size get a pass just because of his peer recruiting and awesome attitude?
Go to page 11, Post 501 and watch his tape. Worst (best) case scenario, he plays safety.
I've seen it.
College is better competition than high school. Sure, he looks good in 7 on 7...it's not the same.
Sure, he looks good having to cover some good receivers sometimes...that's not seeing a good to great receiver every single down in college ball.
What I'm saying is...he's obviously talented. He's obviously undersized. College talent is going to be a lot better than high school.
Why aren't we talking about his size being an issue?
And don't give me "it won't be"...high school film is all fine and dandy...but as we know, it does't always translate to college (in this case, It might because he really is athletic). Conversations about him being undersized (I didn't know until The Opening he was under 5'10" tall) should be happening right now and they're not. I want to know why....'because of his film' isn't a valid in my opinion.
In other words, is anyone at all...be honest...worried about him going up vs a 6'4" receiver who can run? I am.
Not at all. In this class we also have a taller corner in Williams, and possibly Tutt or Griffith. Coach Williams will figure out where to fit him. Why be worried about a recruit who the best high school scouts are calling a stud? Go check out our offensive and defensive recruiting the past few years if you want something to worry about.