HuskerNLimbo Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Nebraska = 24 LINK Quote Link to comment
GMoose Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Yeah, 24 is WAY too high Quote Link to comment
huskerscott Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 I think thats about right. We lose some studs on defense, besides Dennard our secondary is gonna be alittle untested. We have some studs coming in Jackson and Stafford, but they havent hit campus. Plus our offense pretty horrific last year, again losing Helu and Paul will hurt more than some think. Our QB, WR, and Oline have to play a whole lot better, otherwise its about an 8-4 season. Quote Link to comment
Skull&Bones Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Nebraska = 24 LINK I think Auburn was preseason ranked around that number last year. All this means is we are going to win the National Championship Quote Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Nebraska = 24 LINK I think Auburn was preseason ranked around that number last season...And look what happened there. On the other hand... Texas was preseason top 5. Preseason rankings= Worthless. Quote Link to comment
dutch91701 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 24 is about right. If we make it through our season underrated though, it would be comparable to Auburn this past season, if not a tad tougher. Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 I thought we'd be closer to around #20. Win the Big 10 and this number today won't really matter. Quote Link to comment
UGAHusker Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 I thought we'd be closer to 23. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 Doesn't matter where we're ranked preseason. We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. It's all in our hands. Just go win. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. Wow it sounds even more ridiculous when used in a sentence. They really have to change those division names. Quote Link to comment
mitch7 Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 I see this year as being a step back unless this team improves in all aspects of the game. That will be hard to do after loosing some big pieces. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted February 7, 2011 Share Posted February 7, 2011 We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. Wow it sounds even more ridiculous when used in a sentence. They really have to change those division names. Agreed. I feel stupid using it. We should come up with our own nicknames, because Legends and Leaders is freakin' embarrassing. Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 We play three teams ranked above us in October. We'll find out if we deserve higher. Quote Link to comment
nathanwindu Posted February 8, 2011 Share Posted February 8, 2011 We win Legends and the Big 10 CCG, we're in the BCS and likely we're in the MNC game. Wow it sounds even more ridiculous when used in a sentence. They really have to change those division names. Agreed. I feel stupid using it. We should come up with our own nicknames, because Legends and Leaders is freakin' embarrassing. Well, Legends can be Division, and Leaders can be the Delaney Division, cause Delaney did come up with those names (but he'll deny it, saying it was the 'fans') Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.