knapplc Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 According to Jon Nyatawa of the OWS, via Twitter, here are Taylor's targets and the resulting catches thus far this year. Bell: 40 targets (23 catches) Kinnie 36 (19) Enunwa 28 (15) Turner 23 (13) Cotton 22 (13) Burkhead: 19 (15) Reed: 18 (13) Marlowe 16 (9) Cooper 8 (4) Legate 4 (3) Green (2) 1 Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Just think what those numbers would look like if balls that should have been caught were actually caught. Might be bordering on somewhat impressive. Quote Link to comment
Comish Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Not to dog the man, but except for a couple vs Mich St, I'm having a hard time recalling 19 for Kinnie............. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted November 17, 2011 Author Share Posted November 17, 2011 Reed clearly needs to be targeted more. If he's not hurt, we are WAY underutilizing him. Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 And if you like percentages, here: Catching % Bell 57.5% Kinnie 52.7% Enunwa 53.5% Turner 56.5% Cotton 59.0% Burkhead 78.9% Reed 72.2% Marlowe 56.3% Cooper 50% Legate 75% Green 50% Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Not to dog the man, but except for a couple vs Mich St, I'm having a hard time recalling 19 for Kinnie............. He has gotten a lot of short targets, catches. Those add up. Quote Link to comment
Calvin Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Reed clearly needs to be targeted more. If he's not hurt, we are WAY underutilizing him. They have to now don't they? How long is Cotton out? Quote Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Not to dog the man, but except for a couple vs Mich St, I'm having a hard time recalling 19 for Kinnie............. That's because they've all been that damn yard and a half hitch quick toss. Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 Just think what those numbers would look like if balls that should have been caught were actually caught. Might be bordering on somewhat impressive. Yep, BK, Bell, Turner, etc.....we've had "lots" of them. Quote Link to comment
Cornicator Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 These stats don't take into consideration the number of catchable balls each player has dropped. That could give us a better understanding of which guys truly have the dropsies. Enunwa has only dropped about 3 catchable passes all season whereas Kinnie and Bell have been drive killers at important times this year. Quote Link to comment
General Blackshirt Posted November 17, 2011 Share Posted November 17, 2011 And if you like percentages, here: Catching % Bell 57.5% Kinnie 52.7% Enunwa 53.5% Turner 56.5% Cotton 59.0% Burkhead 78.9% Reed 72.2% Marlowe 56.3% Cooper 50% Legate 75% Green 50% Wrong. Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 Don't just tell me I'm wrong mate, correct me so I can go back and edit them. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted November 18, 2011 Author Share Posted November 18, 2011 I wonder if he's saying you're wrong because he's presuming you're showing their percentage of all passes, and not each players' individual drop percentages? Quote Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 It's becuase you didn't round up on some of those. For example, Kinnie percentage is 52.77777777778%, so you rounded down instead of up, so your wrong. Quote Link to comment
General Blackshirt Posted November 18, 2011 Share Posted November 18, 2011 I wonder if he's saying you're wrong because he's presuming you're showing their percentage of all passes, and not each players' individual drop percentages? Correct. That analysis only works if you assume all of Martinez's passes are on target. (hahahaha) Edit: Actually, don't know if I agree with what you said, knapp. At first glance I did, but when I read it carefully I don't think I understand what you meant. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.