Jump to content


Stats of the Bo Pelini Era


Hoosker

Recommended Posts

LyY6mPE.png

 

 

Home = (6-2) (5-2) (7-1) (6-1) (7-0) (5-3) = 36-9

Road = (2-2) (4-1) (3-1) (3-2) (3-2) (3-1) = 18-9

 

 

B1G Head-to-Head Records

 

Illinois: 1-0

(39-19) [+20]

 

Indiana: 0-0

 

Iowa: 2-1

(50-45) [+5]

 

Maryland: 0-0

 

Michigan: 2-1

(57-67) [-10]

 

Michigan State: 2-1

(80-68) [+12]

 

Minnesota: 2-1

(102-62) [+40]

 

Northwestern: 2-1

(81-80) [+1]

 

Ohio State: 1-1

(72-90) [-18]

 

Penn State: 3-0

(49-37) [+12]

 

Purdue: 1-0

(44-7) [+37]

 

Rutgers: 0-0

 

Wisconsin: 1-2

(78-145) [-67]

 

 

Thoughts?

  • Fire 3
Link to comment

That's weird that the guy who made that chart has the same last name as your user name.

 

 

OK, that was dumb.

 

 

Some thoughts:

 

That point differential with Wisconsin is ugly. Damned ugly. Two blowout losses to a decent-to-good team is unacceptable.

 

If you had told me three years ago we'd have a loss to Minnesota before we had a loss to Penn State I'd have called you a liar.

 

We have a .500 or winning record against every school in the conference except Wisky. We'll see what that looks like in a couple more years.

 

We're 2-1 vs. Northwestern but there's only a one-point differential. That's amazing. We should be 3-0, I don't care how "plucky" they are.

Link to comment

LyY6mPE.png

 

 

Home = (6-2) (5-2) (7-1) (6-1) (7-0) (5-3) = 36-9

Road = (2-2) (4-1) (3-1) (3-2) (3-2) (3-1) = 18-9

 

 

B1G Head-to-Head Records

 

Illinois: 1-0

(39-19) [+20]

 

Indiana: 0-0

 

Iowa: 2-1

(50-45) [+5]

 

Maryland: 0-0

 

Michigan: 2-1

(57-67) [-10]

 

Michigan State: 2-1

(80-68) [+12]

 

Minnesota: 2-1

(102-62) [+40]

 

Northwestern: 2-1

(81-80) [+1]

 

Ohio State: 1-1

(72-90) [-18]

 

Penn State: 3-0

(49-37) [+12]

 

Purdue: 1-0

(44-7) [+37]

 

Rutgers: 0-0

 

Wisconsin: 1-2

(78-145) [-67]

 

 

Thoughts?

 

I find it interesting that Wisconsin is the only team we have a losing record with since joining the conference. Listening to some people, you would think we have a losing record to a lot more.

Link to comment


would love that 2009 D with next year's O - we'd be talking 1997 again.

 

Why do you think next years offense will be so good? I thought the offense this season was decent approaching pretty good. Why would the offense improve dramatically over last year? I can see the O being pretty good approaching good (or, in a best case scenario, good). But being very good or great seems a huge, huge stretch. What do you see that so inclines you to think the NU offense in 2014 will be great (or am I only assuming that you think the NU O will be great)?

Link to comment

would love that 2009 D with next year's O - we'd be talking 1997 again.

that's what we said before this year...and I think our O ended up looking very 2009ish.

 

The offense definitely didn't turn out the way anyone wanted, but putting them in the same category as the 2009 offense is a bit much, don't you think?

 

We did put up 28 points on Michigan State's #1 ranked defense (with Abdullah rushing for 100+) despite injuries to Martinez, Turner (who were HUGE last year) and most of the offensive line.

 

The potential was definitely there, but of course potential doesn't mean anything if you don't fully reach it.

Link to comment

would love that 2009 D with next year's O - we'd be talking 1997 again.

 

Why do you think next years offense will be so good? I thought the offense this season was decent approaching pretty good. Why would the offense improve dramatically over last year? I can see the O being pretty good approaching good (or, in a best case scenario, good). But being very good or great seems a huge, huge stretch. What do you see that so inclines you to think the NU offense in 2014 will be great (or am I only assuming that you think the NU O will be great)?

 

AmeerAbdullah.jpg

Link to comment

would love that 2009 D with next year's O - we'd be talking 1997 again.

 

Why do you think next years offense will be so good? I thought the offense this season was decent approaching pretty good. Why would the offense improve dramatically over last year? I can see the O being pretty good approaching good (or, in a best case scenario, good). But being very good or great seems a huge, huge stretch. What do you see that so inclines you to think the NU offense in 2014 will be great (or am I only assuming that you think the NU O will be great)?

 

AmeerAbdullah.jpg

exactly.gif

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...