cm husker Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Bad idea. But it's nibbling around the right idea, which is a true offer and acceptance paradigm. This is purely to help coaches and has nothing to do with helping players make better decisions. It also will hurt schools like Nebraska. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted August 5, 2016 Author Share Posted August 5, 2016 I'm not the biggest fan of an early signing period but I think it would force allowing earlier visits. Given the choice between that and the status quo, those two changes would be a win for Nebraska. 1 Quote Link to comment
cm husker Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 I'm not the biggest fan of an early signing period but I think it would force allowing earlier visits. Given the choice between that and the status quo, those two changes would be a win for Nebraska. I agree that earlier visits are good for NU and everyone. I'd actually love to see the NCAA go to two official visits. The costs are peanuts for P5 schools and it would go a long way in helping a kid evaluate options. I also think it would help schools like NU who focus on the "off field" aspects so much. It will be interesting to see if an early signing period impacts "shotgun offer" tactics. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.