C N Red Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Some Harvard Sports Analysis numbers. Pretty interesting. Since 2005. This past week, four of the top five teams in the Associated Press College Football Poll hailed from the SEC West Division. This has led many, such as Nebraska coach Bo Pelini, to question whether ESPN’s ownership of the brand-new SEC network, which launched this year, may be responsible for such a strange occurrence. “I don’t think that kind of relationship is good for college football. That’s just my opinion,” Pelini said at his news conference. “Anytime you have a relationship with somebody, you have a partnership, you are supposed to be neutral. It’s pretty hard to stay neutral in that situation.” http://harvardsportsanalysis.org/2014/10/conference-bias-in-college-football/ Quote Link to comment
California Husker Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 Wow....geeky, but interesting....and proves what I have been saying my whole life. With just a couple of exceptions, if Nebraska was going to get a shot at wining a national title, they had to go undefeated. Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 It sure is a good thing these polls are virtually useless now. Really, what is the relevance of the AP poll anymore? There is none except people want to see some sort of rankings before the playoff committee releases their first mid season. The AP poll is about as useful as a poopy flavored lollipop now. Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 I don't think I am reading this right ... Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 I don't think I am reading this right ... He made it confusing by not doing conferences and individual teams with negative numbers meaning the same thing. Negative for conference means they're overrated. Negative for a team means they're underrated. He could have easily flipped it for the teams by subtracting the average predicted ranking from the average actual ranking. Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted October 31, 2014 Share Posted October 31, 2014 I don't think I am reading this right ... He made it confusing by not doing conferences and individual teams with negative numbers meaning the same thing. Negative for conference means they're overrated. Negative for a team means they're underrated. Thank you very much. I am on my phone and couldn't get into the particulars, but that is what was causing my confusion. Quote Link to comment
blackshirt98 Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Sec bias , may be truth maybe but I ain't got regrets cause til nebraska beat someone of substance dis shiggidy gon play out. Ain't no disrespect of nebraska by voters just a matta a who is who deez days Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 spell check please. Quote Link to comment
blackshirt98 Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 spell check please.Luv dem folks dat get critical on me, when ya own dam screen name be not even a word skersfan as in huskers fan. Yeah it cute when u do it but not me? Naw hell no Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 I don't spend time trying to spell words incorrectly. I do it automatically. I may look like an idiot, but I do not do it on purpose. I am beginning to think you are tuff as rain. Again please spell check Quote Link to comment
C N Red Posted November 1, 2014 Author Share Posted November 1, 2014 spell check please.Luv dem folks dat get critical on me, when ya own dam screen name be not even a word skersfan as in huskers fan. Yeah it cute when u do it but not me? Naw hell noYou do know most normal people like to sound coherent and not like they're stuck in some 80's rap video no matter what their history/background is don't you? Quote Link to comment
Husker66 Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 win, AP doesn't matter Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Coincidently, the time frame referenced, 2005 to now........I'm not sure any amount of AP poll bias really adversely affected the Huskers. We've done a pretty thorough job of keeping ourselves from being ranked highly and poll bias has had nothin to do with it. Let me know when we beat a team ranked higher than us, or even a ranked team for that matter, then we'll see if we have any room to claim bias is keeping us down. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 Coincidently, the time frame referenced, 2005 to now........I'm not sure any amount of AP poll bias really adversely affected the Huskers. We've done a pretty thorough job of keeping ourselves from being ranked highly and poll bias has had nothin to do with it. Let me know when we beat a team ranked higher than us, or even a ranked team for that matter, then we'll see if we have any room to claim bias is keeping us down. bias is keeping us down... by 5 spots. The data isn't saying we're being kept out of anything major. Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted November 1, 2014 Share Posted November 1, 2014 So, #24 instead of #19...... maybe we (Pelini/Nebraska) shouldn't be the staff bearers of the bias claims. I guess I'm not going to worry about it until actually affects something of substance. And yes I do realize it is real, I just think we need to take care of us before we go worrying about what others may be doing wrong. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.