Mavric Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 Here are five names to keep in mind: Dylan Utter: The junior from Papillion worked his way into a starting job at center in the bowl game. Coaches liked his toughness. Cotton called him "a junkyard dog." Probably a guard candidate, he's one of those motivated in-state kids you shouldn't overlook. Dwayne Johnson: In his third year in the program, Johnson has yet to play. But the 6-foot-6, 285-pounder has some college experience now, and a fresh set of eyes evaluating him. Paul Thurston: He got an education by fire when he came in against Iowa for an injured Reeves and matched up against soon-to-be NFL player Carl Davis. But Thurston survived the day. Nebraska won. That experience can only help the junior. If Reeves is out at the start of spring ball, it could be possible Thurston is first man up at center. Zach Hannon: With Jake Cotton and Mike Moudy gone, there are two open guard spots. Hannon's a guard, and even dabbled a little at center last year once the injuries mounted. It might take a while to know what to make of that competition on the interior of the O-line. But a third-year guy such as Hannon should be full of motivation. David Knevel: In the middle of last season, former Husker O-line coach John Garrison said of Knevel: "In two or three years we're going to be talking about him a lot." Bo Pelini's staff loved his potential. The new staff probably will, too. But now is a good time for the sophomore to make a push. Given that four of Nebraska's tackles are seniors, it's a critical development year for the big Canadian. LJS Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 It seems like Thurston was recruited about 6 years ago! Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt96 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 I love the "Lineman are like Gold" statement. These are the guys that can make an offense look really good. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 damn we sound thin here............ Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 damn we sound thin here............I disagree with "thin". Inexperienced, yes. But if you want to see thin look at our Tackle position after this year. Quote Link to comment
Hunter94 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 damn we sound thin here............I disagree with "thin". Inexperienced, yes. But if you want to see thin look at our Tackle position after this year. you can never have too many inexperienced players........ Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 damn we sound thin here............I disagree with "thin". Inexperienced, yes. But if you want to see thin look at our Tackle position after this year. you can never have too many inexperienced players........ I mean we will have 17 scholly guys plus a potentially good walk-on in Dylan Utter. Quote Link to comment
admo Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 "The development of lineman in the program is huge" I am most worried about the offensive line's success. I feel a bit better after reading this. Still a wait and see with this group. Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 I think all of these linemen are strong in the category of potential nicknames. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted March 3, 2015 Share Posted March 3, 2015 I don't think there is any way in the world to know if we are "thin" on the OL on capable talent. We have a lot of numbers there this year and many of those were pretty highly recruited players out of HS. Now it's time to see what can happen with what I believe to be a good OL coach. There should be enough players here that develop to take care of us this year. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.