MinnwiscowaSker Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Updated our commits and targets recent movement in the new top247 in their individual threads.Thanks for taking the time! Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Updated our commits and targets recent movement in the new top247 in their individual threads.Thanks for taking the time!Not a problem. One thing I thought was funny for the "Nebraska commits/targets always drop while the top schools players always rise" crowd....OhioSt has 12 commits in the top247, 11 of them dropped in rankings. 2 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Updated our commits and targets recent movement in the new top247 in their individual threads.Thanks for taking the time!Not a problem. One thing I thought was funny for the "Nebraska commits/targets always drop while the top schools players always rise" crowd....OhioSt has 12 commits in the top247, 11 of them dropped in rankings. Time to pull scholarship offers. Quote Link to comment
Waldo Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Updated our commits and targets recent movement in the new top247 in their individual threads.Thanks for taking the time!Not a problem. One thing I thought was funny for the "Nebraska commits/targets always drop while the top schools players always rise" crowd....OhioSt has 12 commits in the top247, 11 of them dropped in rankings. Really seemed like uncommitted players rise to create more intrigue 2 Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 Updated our commits and targets recent movement in the new top247 in their individual threads.Thanks for taking the time!Not a problem. One thing I thought was funny for the "Nebraska commits/targets always drop while the top schools players always rise" crowd....OhioSt has 12 commits in the top247, 11 of them dropped in rankings. Really seemed like uncommitted players rise to create more intrigueOr they just evaluate players off what they see. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted July 11, 2017 Author Share Posted July 11, 2017 Looking like no QB. Not looking like there will be a RB either, unless we can flip Pledger Looks like one OT is the target.We currently have 16 open spots, meaning we can sign 19. That number looks to be on the increase.Current Scholarships/CommitsQB - 0 -RB - 0-1 - Grahm Roberts, TJ PledgerWR - 4 - MANUEL ALLEN, JOSHUA MOORE, Cameron Brown, Isaiah CrockerTE - 1 - CAMERON JURGENSOT - 1 - JUCO Badara Traore, Cade BeresfordOG/C - 1 - WILL FARNIOKNT - 1 - MASRY MAPIEUDE - 2 - TATE WILDEMAN, Judge Culpepper, Daniel Carson, Micah ParsonsLB - 1 - Jalen Redmond, Cameron Latu, James Head, David Alston, Elijah Wade, Raymond Scott, Zakoby McClainCB - 3 - BRENDAN RADLEY-HILES, CHASE WILLIAMS, MARIO GOODRICHS - 2 - Bryan Addison, Houston Griffith, Christian TuttATH - Talanoa HufangaK - 1 - BARRET PICKERING Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted July 14, 2017 Author Share Posted July 14, 2017 Sounds like a bunch of the "big" recruits are targeting the Wisconsin game for OVs. Quote Link to comment
Frostberg Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Why were we not in on iwcc OT McKinney? 6'8 300lbs. Committed to tcu Quote Link to comment
famoustitles Posted July 14, 2017 Share Posted July 14, 2017 Why were we not in on iwcc OT McKinney? 6'8 300lbs. Committed to tcu That's up to you to decide since coaches can't comment on it. Here are your options: -character issues -grade issues -didn't fit our scheme -coaches don't know what they're doing -poor coach evaluation -low on our board -we contacted but there wasn't interest -don't have room this year Ect... Quote Link to comment
broganreynik Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 Why were we not in on iwcc OT McKinney? 6'8 300lbs. Committed to tcu That's up to you to decide since coaches can't comment on it. Here are your options: -character issues -grade issues -didn't fit our scheme -coaches don't know what they're doing -poor coach evaluation -low on our board -we contacted but there wasn't interest -don't have room this year Ect... -Coaches would prefer to spend as little time as possible in Council Bluffs 1 Quote Link to comment
Caliborn72 Posted July 15, 2017 Share Posted July 15, 2017 I know it's mostly unrelated, but the news today is why I'm still so damn confused about no QB/no RB for '18. This class has been so much fun to follow, and it can still get even better, but I will still always have doubts no matter how strong the class finishes. I don't know anything resembling close to what the coaches know, but this seems pretty silly and myopic. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 We can now sign 20, and counting. #SmallClass Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted July 16, 2017 Share Posted July 16, 2017 Make that 21 How'd it go from 15-16 to 21? I know about Watts and Blades, but what am I forgetting? Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted July 16, 2017 Author Share Posted July 16, 2017 Make that 21 How'd it go from 15-16 to 21? I know about Watts and Blades, but what am I forgetting? It started at 15 open spots but since we can over-sign by three we could always sign 18. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.