Warrior10 Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 Figured might be interesting to occasionally see our rankings move over next 2 months as a ton of movement happens. 12/15 Rivals- 44 Scout-38 247- 31 Espn- 27 3 Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 Figured might be interesting to occasionally see our rankings move over next 2 months as a ton of movement happens. 12/15 Rivals- 44 Scout-38 247- 31 Espn- 27 Top 50. Heck yeah! Bring on Bama Quote Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 Not good that ESPN has us rated the highest, IMO. Most consider them to be the goofiest of the scouting services. Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted December 15, 2015 Author Share Posted December 15, 2015 Not good that ESPN has us rated the highest, IMO. Most consider them to be the goofiest of the scouting services.Yup Quote Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. 2 Quote Link to comment
GBRedneck Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 The sheer numbers of additional recruits we'll add by signing day will bump the rankings up. But I have a sinking feeling we'll be scrambling to fill out the class. 1 Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. They are no worse than the last coaching staff. Why say stuff like this? 1 Quote Link to comment
GBRedneck Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. They are no worse than the last coaching staff. Why say stuff like this? Wins and Losses would like to have a word with you. 2 Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. They are no worse than the last coaching staff. Why say stuff like this? Wins and Losses would like to have a word with you. I'm referring to the recruiting. Quote Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. They are no worse than the last coaching staff. Why say stuff like this? Why not? They're recruiting has been sub par. Also, are you saying this coaching staff only needs to meet the expectations of the last staff? Why say stuff like this? 2 Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. They are no worse than the last coaching staff. Why say stuff like this? Why not? They're recruiting has been sub par. Also, are you saying this coaching staff only needs to meet the expectations of the last staff? Why say stuff like this? You said that THIS coaching staff makes it harder to recruit to Nebraska when in fact it doesn't based on the players that the last staff recruited compared to ones this staff has recruited. They are the same. No better. No worse. Thats all. Quote Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted December 15, 2015 Share Posted December 15, 2015 It's hard enough recruiting top football players to Nebraska and when you have this coaching staff it makes it harder. They are no worse than the last coaching staff. Why say stuff like this? Why not? They're recruiting has been sub par. Also, are you saying this coaching staff only needs to meet the expectations of the last staff? Why say stuff like this? You said that THIS coaching staff makes it harder to recruit to Nebraska when in fact it doesn't based on the players that the last staff recruited compared to ones this staff has recruited. They are the same. No better. No worse. Thats all. You are overthinking this. Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 We wanted the last staff gone because theiy sucked at recruiting. Mark it down...all four of those services will be at 25 or better come Feb. Quote Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 We wanted the last staff gone because theiy sucked at recruiting. Mark it down...all four of those services will be at 25 or better come Feb. 1 Quote Link to comment
Kiyoat Husker Posted December 17, 2015 Share Posted December 17, 2015 Thanks for starting this thread, Warrior10! +1 I hope to check this thread occasionally and see updates on our ranking, ..... you know, as opposed to having to wade through pages and pages of posts trashing the staff and arguing about whether we should trash the staff. That would be less preferable. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.