Jump to content


Dead period almost over


Recommended Posts


 

 

Supposedly we are going to make a run at quite a few guys committed to other teams.

Teams like Hastings College or teams like Michigan State?
Havnt heard names or schools. But your comment is a actual general worry among the recruiting analysts...not to Hastings level but MAC, WAC, Mountain West level.
Link to comment


We're in on enough "big" targets that we'll get at least a couple of them. I mean ... we have to get at least a couple of them. Right? :)

 

But the problem is the number of "big" targets we're in on is shrinking and the number of spots we have to fill is growing. I think we will get some nice commits in the next three weeks. But I'm not sure how we're going to fill out the rest of the class.

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

We're in on enough "big" targets that we'll get at least a couple of them. I mean ... we have to get at least a couple of them. Right? :)

 

But the problem is the number of "big" targets we're in on is shrinking and the number of spots we have to fill is growing. I think we will get some nice commits in the next three weeks. But I'm not sure how we're going to fill out the rest of the class.

^This x 1000. Yes, quality is good right now. The staff will likely add 2-3 of the guys we're still in on, quality will still be high. But after that, we'll have a minimum of 3, maximum of 6 spots to fill with no legitimate (should be playing B1G football at Nebraska) targets left. New targets can pop up, but I'm not confident.

Link to comment

 

We're in on enough "big" targets that we'll get at least a couple of them. I mean ... we have to get at least a couple of them. Right? :)

 

But the problem is the number of "big" targets we're in on is shrinking and the number of spots we have to fill is growing. I think we will get some nice commits in the next three weeks. But I'm not sure how we're going to fill out the rest of the class.

^This x 1000. Yes, quality is good right now. The staff will likely add 2-3 of the guys we're still in on, quality will still be high. But after that, we'll have a minimum of 3, maximum of 6 spots to fill with no legitimate (should be playing B1G football at Nebraska) targets left. New targets can pop up, but I'm not confident.

 

So, a Bo-like class? Ugggg

Link to comment

Bo was typically around a top 25 class, so this class has a ways to go to be a "Bo-like class", particularly given how well it actually started under Bo. For all the talk of the new staff revolutionizing our recruiting, they sure haven't shown a whole lot in actual results.

Link to comment

We're in on enough "big" targets that we'll get at least a couple of them. I mean ... we have to get at least a couple of them. Right? :)

 

But the problem is the number of "big" targets we're in on is shrinking and the number of spots we have to fill is growing. I think we will get some nice commits in the next three weeks. But I'm not sure how we're going to fill out the rest of the class.

I haven't been following recruiting very well this year, but is our lack of bodies due more to the fact that "we're in on some 'big' targets" and forced to wait until they announce, or is the staff not utilizing the resources efficiently? From all I have heard, Riley and staff have been hitting it hard. But again, that is only what I have heard.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...