BigRedBuster Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Since they are now actually part of the program, I thought this could be in the football forum. LINK 2. Patrick O'Brien, Nebraska, 6-4/225, .9189: If O'Brien had Peters' delivery, he'd be No. 1. O'Brien has a bit of a baseball motion, but everything else — the quickness of the motion, the accuracy, the variety of throws, the way O'Brien buys time in the pocket, his willingness to throw it short when it's there — is really sharp. O'Brien is a rumbler as a runner, but he's pretty good at making his way around the pocket. He has poise. I find it interesting that Iowa's QB isn't even on the list. 1 Quote Link to comment
cornographic Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 I'd take 6'4" 225 over 6'4" 195 everyday and twice on Sunday. POB #1! Quote Link to comment
Waterloohusker26 Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 I'd take 6'4" 225 over 6'4" 195 everyday and twice on Sunday. POB #1! You're giving the staff some credit?!?!? Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 Peters was the Huskers' top target early on. Great rise for O'Brien -- Nebraska was the first to offer him, I believe. Nobody was onto this guy. Quote Link to comment
cornographic Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 I'd take 6'4" 225 over 6'4" 195 everyday and twice on Sunday. POB #1! You're giving the staff some credit?!?!? I've been pro Riley to date, not in the hater column. I like BIG, what can I say? I hope POB has some mobility, though. Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted February 3, 2016 Share Posted February 3, 2016 I find it interesting that Iowa's QB isn't even on the list.Towards the top of the article, writer says no film to evaluate the Iowa QB. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.