First reaction to 2016 All-White Alternate Uniforms

[Kiyoat Husker]

Just wanted to see the reactions by the numbers. Lots of opinions on here about the alternates.

[skersfan]

Normally would pick the last choice, so kind of surprised that I like them. Never have liked them before. Absolutely hate the black stuff. Fine with having it in the stands for a black out, but never the main uniform.

[Branno]

Big thumbs up.

[Hooked on Huskers]

I like all-white if Huskers win. I hate all-white if Huskers lose.

[Kiyoat Husker]

93% positive so far, with 28 votes...

[broganreynik]

Overall, I like it. My only quibble is with the 'N' on the pants. Aside from that, it seems they've finally got the right color combo and gotten rid of the stencil numbers, so I dig them.

[Scarlet Overkill]

I'm not in love with all whites normally, but I do love the look of these ... Unless they lose the game, in which case, I will hate them, and they will be the only reason the Huskers lost.

[Landlord]

Overall I do genuinely really like them. But Adidas still struggles with the details.

 

 

Ditch the chrome. It *really* didn't look good under the lights against Illinois, and it still didn't look good in the sun against Northwestern last year.

 

The cuts in the stripes are superfluous and don't really seem on purpose other than "let's make it different than normal".

 

The giant 'N' undershirts are hideous, and I can't believe they are STILL trying to make that work.

 

The 'N' on the pant legs is an interesting concept, but you could at least make it have the same width and spacing as the actual leg stripes.

 

 

 

 

Otherwise, like I said, overall I think they are cool, but they could have been even better.

[BigRedBuster]

Overall I do genuinely really like them. But Adidas still struggles with the details.

 

 

Ditch the chrome. It *really* didn't look good under the lights against Illinois, and it still didn't look good in the sun against Northwestern last year.

 

The cuts in the stripes are superfluous and don't really seem on purpose other than "let's make it different than normal".

 

The giant 'N' undershirts are hideous, and I can't believe they are STILL trying to make that work.

 

The 'N' on the pant legs is an interesting concept, but you could at least make it have the same width and spacing as the actual leg stripes.

 

 

 

 

Otherwise, like I said, overall I think they are cool, but they could have been even better.

File that under....find reasons to complain.

[Kiyoat Husker]

I voted love them. I think they played it safe here, and with Nebraska that's the smart move. They look clean and sharp, but I am a little disappointed they didn't try to blow us away with something really creative. With our fan base, an edgy look is dangerous in a contract negotiation year, IMO

[Kiyoat Husker]

88% positive with 43 votes...

[Swiv3D]

Did you guys do this poll in years past with the other alt unis and if so, what were the #'s for those?

[Landlord]

 

Overall I do genuinely really like them. But Adidas still struggles with the details.

 

 

Ditch the chrome. It *really* didn't look good under the lights against Illinois, and it still didn't look good in the sun against Northwestern last year.

 

The cuts in the stripes are superfluous and don't really seem on purpose other than "let's make it different than normal".

 

The giant 'N' undershirts are hideous, and I can't believe they are STILL trying to make that work.

 

The 'N' on the pant legs is an interesting concept, but you could at least make it have the same width and spacing as the actual leg stripes.

 

 

 

 

Otherwise, like I said, overall I think they are cool, but they could have been even better.

File that under....find reasons to complain.

 

 

 

I design stuff for a living, can't really help the lens through which I look at designs. But, just because I guess I can't stress it enough, I really like them.

[Dagerow]

Solid.

[CheeseHusker]

Like them. Far from perfect but it's a start.... every previous set would have been met with the bottom answer from me.