ZRod Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Uh... I thought she was the smart one? Link to comment
Landlord Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 Uh... I thought she was the smart one? well apparently you aren't it's a fake account. ALTvanka Link to comment
ZRod Posted April 20, 2017 Share Posted April 20, 2017 https://twitter.com/AltvankaTrump/status/855088131300839425 Uh... I thought she was the smart one? well apparently you aren't it's a fake account. ALTvanka I actually noticed that it was probably fake after I posted. Link to comment
Moiraine Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Sessions is "amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power." This group of morons deserves to have people read into their statements, so here goes. What Sessions meant was: Hawaii has less White Americans than it has Asian/Polynesian Americans, therefore it's less of a state. Non-Whites aren't as American as Whites. 1 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Sessions is "amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power." This group of morons deserves to have people read into their statements, so here goes. What Sessions meant was: Hawaii has less White Americans than it has Asian/Polynesian Americans, therefore it's less of a state. Non-Whites aren't as American as Whites. Yes but what I think you're forgetting is Hawaii is actually a part of Kenya. 3 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 Should have just lost every remaining vote from Hawaii they were hoping to get in the next elections. Link to comment
NM11046 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/856886158940307457 So help me out - is it ok to just say "no" when these are requested? WTF is wrong with people that they don't see that they are hiding information. This is flagrant. 4 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/856886158940307457 So help me out - is it ok to just say "no" when these are requested? WTF is wrong with people that they don't see that they are hiding information. This is flagrant. To quote my Republican friends on Capital Hill: If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about... 1 Link to comment
ZRod Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I think any Democratic or Republican administration would do the same. "Unless you have a subpoena, don't waste our time. Why should we help smear our own?" Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 If true, this is a sign of incompetence. There’s a time-tested way for White House aides or other administration officials to roll a president into approving a preferred policy of theirs while letting him think he’s still in charge. They present him with three options: one of which is obviously too extreme, one of which is far too weak, and the third of which is just right. This last one, not so coincidentally, is what the advisers wanted all along. Clever, right? Now, according to a new report by Politico’s Josh Dawsey, Shane Goldmacher, and Alex Isenstadt, President Donald Trump’s aides added a further innovation by simplifying this process even further. Why give the president three options, after all, when you can just give him one? Link to comment
NM11046 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 They should just give him a coloring book or a paint by numbers to keep him busy. He can still sign his name to them and sit at his big boy desk and show them off. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 The problem with this is, his advisors need to be really good or we are in trouble. With who is sitting in that picture, it makes me extremely nervous. Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Holy moly, all this time, Flynn was OBAMA'S FAULT. Obama administration reviewed Mike Flynn's security clearance, Trump WH says The White House today attempted to shift blame for the vetting of President Trump's former national security adviser, Mike Flynn, to the Obama administration. "His [security] clearance was last reissued by the Obama administration in 2016 with full knowledge of his activities that occurred in 2015," press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters this afternoon. When asked whether Flynn would still have his job if he hadn't been fired by the president in February, Spicer said, "I will just say they think the president made the right call at the right time and it's clearly paid off." Spicer also said the Trump administration welcomes the Department of Defense investigation of Flynn. Flynn, who was President Trump's first national security adviser, was fired after it was discovered that he misled Vice President Mike Pence about conversations he had with a Russian official. Documents released in March showed Flynn was paid a total of $56,200 in 2015 by three Russian firms owned by or closely tied to the Kremlin. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 When asked whether Flynn would still have his job if he hadn't been fired by the president in February, Spicer said, "I will just say they think the president made the right call at the right time and it's clearly paid off." How exactly does hiring someone who never should have been hired and then firing them when the media gets ahold of those horrible illegal leaks......pay off? Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted May 3, 2017 Share Posted May 3, 2017 Stuff that makes you go ... 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts