Jump to content


Trump's cabinet


Recommended Posts


Sessions is "amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power."

 

 

This group of morons deserves to have people read into their statements, so here goes. What Sessions meant was:

 

Hawaii has less White Americans than it has Asian/Polynesian Americans, therefore it's less of a state. Non-Whites aren't as American as Whites.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

Sessions is "amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power."

 

 

This group of morons deserves to have people read into their statements, so here goes. What Sessions meant was:

 

Hawaii has less White Americans than it has Asian/Polynesian Americans, therefore it's less of a state. Non-Whites aren't as American as Whites.

 

Yes but what I think you're forgetting is Hawaii is actually a part of Kenya.

  • Fire 3
Link to comment

https://mobile.twitter.com/jimsciutto/status/856886158940307457

 

So help me out - is it ok to just say "no" when these are requested?

 

WTF is wrong with people that they don't see that they are hiding information. This is flagrant.

 

To quote my Republican friends on Capital Hill:

 

If you've got nothing to hide, you've got nothing to worry about...

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

If true, this is a sign of incompetence.

 

 

There’s a time-tested way for White House aides or other administration officials to roll a president into approving a preferred policy of theirs while letting him think he’s still in charge. They present him with three options: one of which is obviously too extreme, one of which is far too weak, and the third of which is just right. This last one, not so coincidentally, is what the advisers wanted all along. Clever, right?

Now, according to a new report by Politico’s Josh Dawsey, Shane Goldmacher, and Alex Isenstadt, President Donald Trump’s aides added a further innovation by simplifying this process even further. Why give the president three options, after all, when you can just give him one?

 

Link to comment

Holy moly, all this time, Flynn was OBAMA'S FAULT.

 

:blink:

 

 

Obama administration reviewed Mike Flynn's security clearance, Trump WH says

 

The White House today attempted to shift blame for the vetting of President Trump's former national security adviser, Mike Flynn, to the Obama administration.

 

"His [security] clearance was last reissued by the Obama administration in 2016 with full knowledge of his activities that occurred in 2015," press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters this afternoon.

 

When asked whether Flynn would still have his job if he hadn't been fired by the president in February, Spicer said, "I will just say they think the president made the right call at the right time and it's clearly paid off."

 

Spicer also said the Trump administration welcomes the Department of Defense investigation of Flynn.

 

Flynn, who was President Trump's first national security adviser, was fired after it was discovered that he misled Vice President Mike Pence about conversations he had with a Russian official.

 

Documents released in March showed Flynn was paid a total of $56,200 in 2015 by three Russian firms owned by or closely tied to the Kremlin.

Link to comment
When asked whether Flynn would still have his job if he hadn't been fired by the president in February, Spicer said, "I will just say they think the president made the right call at the right time and it's clearly paid off."

 

How exactly does hiring someone who never should have been hired and then firing them when the media gets ahold of those horrible illegal leaks......pay off?

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...