knapplc Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 After a year as your Starting QB, I'd like to take a moment to talk about all the positives that occurred under my watch. 1. LESS BAD SNAPS IN 2016. Count and I spent hours and hours with my hands under his butt cheeks working on the perfect "snap" too make sure you guys didn't have to cringe on Saturdays. It wasn't always easy and I believe it is in part the reason Count is no longer with us. However, the time spent was extremely worthwhile. 2.FEWER DROPPED PASSES IN 2016. Yes, I'm taking credit for this. Obviously, my passes were crisp as hell and QMany, Redux and Decked faked injuries all season long to try an make me look bad, however, when 99.9% of my passes hit receivers in the chest, you've gotta give credit where credit is due. 3. FEWER POLICE REPORTS Well, you see, 2015 was a tough year. We got that big win against Rutgers and I decided it was a good idea to have a rager at my place. Well, you all know how that ended up. In 2016, I vowed for changes and as you can see, it panned out. I deserve a chance to come back for another year. I'm planning on being a statue in the pocket next year, coach says my passing has really come along. Coach says he can finally run his offense next season. I want to be that guy. A person may not hold the same position they held last year. They may be on the team again, but if so they'll have to be in a new position. We're doing this to keep the Starting Lineup fresh and fun, and because there are a LOT of folks who could hold these positions. 2 Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Are we switching to a 3-4? Would really appreciate a nose guard nomination. If not, that's cool too. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted January 18, 2017 Share Posted January 18, 2017 Are we switching to a 3-4? Would really appreciate nose gaurd nomination. If not, that's cool too. Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 I'm 6'3" 250..... I've got Tight End written aaaallllll over me...... Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 19, 2017 Author Share Posted January 19, 2017 Are we switching to a 3-4? Would really appreciate a nose guard nomination. If not, that's cool too. That's a good question. Have to think about that a bit. What does everyone think? Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Are we switching to a 3-4? Would really appreciate a nose guard nomination. If not, that's cool too. That's a good question. Have to think about that a bit. What does everyone think? Do eeet. Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Are we switching to a 3-4? Would really appreciate a nose guard nomination. If not, that's cool too. That's a good question. Have to think about that a bit. What does everyone think? You're making more work for yourself, and if Riley is canned in two years and we go back to a 4-3 you're going to have a wonky spreadsheet. Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Are we switching to a 3-4? Would really appreciate a nose guard nomination. If not, that's cool too. That's a good question. Have to think about that a bit. What does everyone think? You're making more work for yourself, and if Riley is canned in two years and we go back to a 4-3 you're going to have a wonky spreadsheet. Good point. Let's just go 3-3-5 then it doesn't matter! 1 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Let's go with Multiple D Quote Link to comment
Saunders Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Let's go with Multiple D You would like to go with multiple D's.... 4 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Let's go with Multiple D You would like to go with multiple D's.... Who wouldn't? With multiple d you never know which direction you'll be penetrated from! 1 Quote Link to comment
Army_Allen Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Let's go with Multiple D You would like to go with multiple D's.... Who wouldn't? With multiple d you never know which direction you'll be penetrated from!Well if we went back to the option attack, we could go both ways! Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Let's go with Multiple DYou would like to go with multiple D's.... Who wouldn't? With multiple d you never know which direction you'll be penetrated from!Well if we went back to the option attack, we could go both ways! Ah yeah! Multiple penetrable angles from the D and going both ways would be unstoppable. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted January 19, 2017 Share Posted January 19, 2017 Okay hold a phone. I'm being out voted 7 votes to 4 currently in the HC vote thread by none other than 84Husker. Are there 7 people here that REALLY like 84 more than me?! The 8 votes for Enhance I can understand, but 7 freaking votes for 84?! 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.