Moiraine Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 57 minutes ago, TGHusker said: Big different from the Nixon era. As I recall, there were many repubs standing wt dems to voice their disgust of Nixon, the Sat night masacre, and all things Watergate. Today's Repub party has picked a pretty low hill to die on. Back then the news was news. What's surprising is how many people who lived through it are duped by Fox. Then you have younger people who google search for what they want to hear. I don't think our government/country will withstand things if they stay this way or get worse. I kinda wonder about the world too because a lot of other countries are susceptible to the same problem. They just don't all have their version of Trump (yet). There's not a huge chasm between having a population that doesn't know what's real and having government controlled media. Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Good God almighty they're just the worst people imaginable. This is now the second person joke around at a dying man's expense. Link to comment
FrankWheeler Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 12 hours ago, Clifford Franklin said: Good God almighty they're just the worst people imaginable. This is now the second person joke around at a dying man's expense. This comes after the fit that was just thrown over the 'perfect smokey eye' jokes. There are so many inconsistencies with this administration it is maddening. Link to comment
Whistlebritches Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 15 hours ago, Clifford Franklin said: Good God almighty they're just the worst people imaginable. This is now the second person joke around at a dying man's expense. I see comments similar to this on twitter and I dismiss them as trolls and bots. Then later in the day on a talk radio show I hear how the conservative host is very upset because a bunch of people are texting in these same kinds of comments. What a bunch of s#!tty people. 1 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: So they either weren't invited or they all said no. Also, if this is about military spouses (not wives), why aren't there a few men? 1 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 20 minutes ago, Moiraine said: So they either weren't invited or they all said no. Also, if this is about military spouses (not wives), why aren't there a few men? Because the 1950s culture was the most correct culture & the one to which we must return. Men are off at work & women only leave the kitchen when they can be trotted out for ceremonial functions like these. Back when everyone knew their place. Even if they shoot the moon & miss, fallback is we just wind up with Reagan-era culture. 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted May 14, 2018 Share Posted May 14, 2018 6 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: I'm surprised Okla City isn't considering it or being considered. Okla is the redist of the red states wt all 77 counties going for Trump. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted May 14, 2018 Share Posted May 14, 2018 5 minutes ago, TGHusker said: I'm surprised Okla City isn't considering it or being considered. Okla is the redist of the red states wt all 77 counties going for Trump. My thought was that it's probably going to end up in Omaha. Link to comment
mrandyk Posted May 14, 2018 Share Posted May 14, 2018 Quote "Most of the cities that have turned down the RNC are Democratic cities," said Evan Siegfried, a New York-based Republican strategist. I also have on good authority that most water is wet. 2 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted May 15, 2018 Share Posted May 15, 2018 Slapping his name with big letters on buildings is what this man does. Link to comment
TGHusker Posted May 15, 2018 Share Posted May 15, 2018 So I wonder if Cohen worked out some back door royalty agreement to have Trump's name on the building Link to comment
Recommended Posts