Self Imposed Sanctions

[The Maudfather]

Disclaimer: I'm far from a recruiting guru, but our class looks to be locked in at 20 for this year, while the coaches have floated the number being 22 to 23. Maybe you recruiting guys can help me out, but why would we, essentially, self impose a sanction on ourselves, especially coming off a season where depth has killed us?

[Huskinator]

Correct me if I'm wrong..... difnt 22/23 factor in over signing. We don't need to over sign.

[Mavric]

22 spots. Could have over-signed to 25.

 

I was confused all along why Riley kept going for 22. The only reason I can think of would be to save a couple for a smaller class next year.

 

But as it turned out, we should have been shooting for 25 and ended up at his number.

[Red Five]

Mav was saying that we could go up to 25

 

I'm of the opinion that you go +3 every year. You always have guys leave over the spring/summer for one reason or another.

[BigRedBuster]

We could have taken some lower ranked players but we went after some big fish (Lewis, Lenoir, Johnson, mike O) that went elsewhere.

 

We also got some big fish.

 

I would have loved to have those guys. But, I'm ok with this strategy.

[Hedley Lamarr]

Im typically not a fan of it. However grad transfers are being hinted at for us. We also have a class of 14ish next year. With this and attrition we can balance our classes to get next years around 20 recruits. You give Donte a full year to recruit, you give Parella a full year now. Have an open spot that can be filled by another ace.

[The Murphinator]

Don't waste scholarships this year on lower rated players when you could use them next year to try and get some more big fish.

[Decked]

Grad transfers was the first thing that came to my mind

[RedDenver]

Mav was saying that we could go up to 25

 

I'm of the opinion that you go +3 every year. You always have guys leave over the spring/summer for one reason or another.

I'd like to see us shoot for the correct number and save the +3 for last minute highly-ranked guys.

[macroboy]

Disclaimer: I'm far from a recruiting guru, but our class looks to be locked in at 20 for this year, while the coaches have floated the number being 22 to 23. Maybe you recruiting guys can help me out, but why would we, essentially, self impose a sanction on ourselves, especially coming off a season where depth has killed us?

Would you rather they take guys they didn't really want to hit the number?

[commando]

OMG OMG OMG.........we didn't sign 25? the sky is falling!!!

[Atbone95]

Disclaimer: I'm far from a recruiting guru, but our class looks to be locked in at 20 for this year, while the coaches have floated the number being 22 to 23. Maybe you recruiting guys can help me out, but why would we, essentially, self impose a sanction on ourselves, especially coming off a season where depth has killed us?

The concept of a "sanction" on ourselves is just a total misconception.

 

We will have 85 scholarship players in the fall, like every school.

 

Anything not signed in this class will go to grad transfers and deserving walk-ons, like it does every year.

[QMany]

This was one of the complaints about Pelini's roster management too.

[commando]

This was one of the complaints about Pelini's roster management too.

well crap...that does it....pelini'ed again.

[Hedley Lamarr]

This was one of the complaints about Pelini's roster management too.

The difference is Pelini undersigned while also signing the mason walds of the world.