Jump to content


Will There be War wt N Korea next 4 years


Will there be a War with N. Korea?  

42 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts


This can be ended with one well trained sniper with the window of opportunity presented to him......................this doesn't need to be an all out nuclear war nor should it be. Trump needs to shut up and do work behind the scenes to stop this. He's playing right into this chubby little bastards hands.

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

This can be ended with one well trained sniper with the window of opportunity presented to him......................this doesn't need to be an all out nuclear war nor should it be. Trump needs to shut up and do work behind the scenes to stop this. He's playing right into this chubby little bastards hands.

 

 

Are you suggesting a state sanctioned assassination?

We have a policy against assassinating foreign leaders.

Link to comment

 

This can be ended with one well trained sniper with the window of opportunity presented to him......................this doesn't need to be an all out nuclear war nor should it be. Trump needs to shut up and do work behind the scenes to stop this. He's playing right into this chubby little bastards hands.

 

 

Are you suggesting a state sanctioned assassination?

We have a policy against assassinating foreign leaders.

 

Of course we do!

  • Fire 3
Link to comment

 

This can be ended with one well trained sniper with the window of opportunity presented to him......................this doesn't need to be an all out nuclear war nor should it be. Trump needs to shut up and do work behind the scenes to stop this. He's playing right into this chubby little bastards hands.

 

Are you suggesting a state sanctioned assassination?

We have a policy against assassinating foreign leaders.

 

That phrase needs a wink emoji, because there have been a few foreign heads of state that have not survived US "intervention." There was the overthrow of the Iranian government in the 1950s where we put the Shah in power, various coups and government overthrows in Central & South America sponsored, funded or directly operated by the CIA, similar actions from Africa post-WWII, Manuel Noriega in Nicaragua in the 1980s, Saddam Hussein in Iraq under W... and that's not remotely a full list.

 

So while we may not directly put bullet into brain, we sure do depose foreign heads of state, and often they don't survive the process.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

 

 

This can be ended with one well trained sniper with the window of opportunity presented to him......................this doesn't need to be an all out nuclear war nor should it be. Trump needs to shut up and do work behind the scenes to stop this. He's playing right into this chubby little bastards hands.

 

Are you suggesting a state sanctioned assassination?

We have a policy against assassinating foreign leaders.

 

That phrase needs a wink emoji, because there have been a few foreign heads of state that have not survived US "intervention." There was the overthrow of the Iranian government in the 1950s where we put the Shah in power, various coups and government overthrows in Central & South America sponsored, funded or directly operated by the CIA, similar actions from Africa post-WWII, Manuel Noriega in Nicaragua in the 1980s, Saddam Hussein in Iraq under W... and that's not remotely a full list.

 

So while we may not directly put bullet into brain, we sure do depose foreign heads of state, and often they don't survive the process.

 

Exactly...

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

 

This can be ended with one well trained sniper with the window of opportunity presented to him......................this doesn't need to be an all out nuclear war nor should it be. Trump needs to shut up and do work behind the scenes to stop this. He's playing right into this chubby little bastards hands.

 

 

Are you suggesting a state sanctioned assassination?

We have a policy against assassinating foreign leaders.

 

 

"Policy"

 

air-quotes.gif

  • Fire 6
Link to comment

I'm not condoning any of those actions, but don't you think a sponsored coup or over throw is a little different than explicitly targeting a foreign leader for assassination? Granted it's just a way for the US to wash it's hands of the situation.

 

Noriega died this year at the age of 83 from complications due to brain surgery, more than 20 years after he was deposed. Saddam had something of a trial before he was sentenced and executed.

Link to comment

 

It is indeed meant to be a distraction, isn't it? Shut it with all the other "petty" politics stuff; if you don't, you're unpatriotic.

 

 

 

This is AWFULLY similar to how Ted Nugent called for unity and the end of hateful rhetoric after Steve Scalise got shot.

 

This is the same guy who said Obama should suck on his machine gun, among other not-so-subtle jokes about his assassination.

 

Seems guys like these are awfully selective about when we should come together.

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

Are you suggesting a state sanctioned assassination?

I'm suggesting that there shouldn't be nuclear weapons involved in any sort of conflict with this individual and civilians certainly shouldn't have to die because he continues to rattle his saber. I don't agree with the way Trump is handling this situation and I certainly don't agree carpet bombing another country is the right answer either. Fat man is obviously more dangerous than his father was due to the fact that he now has nuclear capabilities and a dumbass President to poke the bear and say, "I dare you...." If he falls down some random stairs or something and breaks his neck....................so be it. Our military has much more precise methods to take care of this issue than resorting back to WWII tactics. North Korea is brain washed, there is zero way he'd stand trial there so that's not an option.

Link to comment

According to Jim Rose, North Koreans are all miserable and would welcome the United States "turning their country into a sand trap" putting them out of their misery.

 

It amazes me that people like this not only exist, but have a megaphone via 1100AM in Omaha. The sad thing is, the other people chuckled and said, "you're probably right."

  • Fire 2
Link to comment

I think Bill Clinton's SOD, William Cohen, has some good advise here. Trump should have just kept his big mouth shut. But he is incapable of such a measured response. I wonder what other nations think of and how they plan around the juvenile in chief.

 

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/william-cohen-north-korea-donald-trump-silence/2017/08/09/id/806692/

 

President Donald Trump remaining silent in the wake of threats from North Korea would have been more effective than saying he would bring "fire and fury" against the Kim Jong-un regime, according to William Cohen, who was secretary of defense during President Bill Clinton's administration.

Silence from Trump would have had a more "powerful impact," Cohen said Wednesday on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"It's always better, if you see an enemy that remains silent, that's more frightening than someone who is beating his chest or engaging in schoolyard banter or locker room language," the former defense secretary said.

Trump should not send a message that is "bomb-bastic," Cohen said, adding, "that kind of language is not going to intimidate the North Koreans," Cohen added.

"Silence would have been very good here, and let the diplomats like Secretary (of State Rex) Tillerson, let the others who are trying to bring about a peaceful solution to this, have the authority to do so," Cohen said.

He said threats would have no effect on the regime.

"Simply issuing threats — which the North Koreans are not going to take as serious, because they know intuitively, I think, that the United States is not going to launch a preemptive attack, putting at risk hundreds of thousands, if not millions of South Koreans, and Japanese, and others," Cohen said.

North Korea's goal is to remain secure and to someday rule over the Korean peninsula, not to "invite a nuclear holocaust," the former defense secretary said.

"The North Koreans have simply accelerated their development and their goal to develop a nuclear capability, one that can threaten the United States, but they are not suicidal," Cohen said.

 

 

Back in April, Cohen also commented on North Korea in an MSNBC interview with Andrea Mitchell. He said that China's help against North Korea is key. "I think the Chinese understand that to allow North Korea to continue doing what it's doing is going to destabilize the region."

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...