DOJ Initial Russia Hearings

[Nebfanatic]

On 9/8/2018 at 2:22 PM, Ric Flair said:

 

The guy’s a mid-level staffer who Mueller went after for....no one really knows....and all he could nail him with was mildly inconsistent statements because the guy got confused. 

 

That seems like an AWESOME use of taxpayer dollars and law enforcement resources. Interesting that many of the same people who want to catch and release illegals so they can go forth and commit more crimes also want Papadopoulos persecuted simply for being connected with Trump.

 

 

I think you misinterpret the situation. Papadopoulos is a stepping stone. As someone else has said, this investigation is important no matter where you stand on Trump. Russians messing with our elections is as about important as it gets. 

[Ric Flair]

5 hours ago, Nebfanatic said:

I think you misinterpret the situation. Papadopoulos is a stepping stone. As someone else has said, this investigation is important no matter where you stand on Trump. Russians messing with our elections is as about important as it gets. 

 

So where is the proof Papadapoulos was involved in or knows anything about Trump colluding with Russia to fix the election?

[commando]

1 minute ago, Ric Flair said:

 

So where is the proof Papadapoulos was involved in or knows anything about Trump colluding with Russia to fix the election?

where is the proof there isn't any evidence of wrongdoing?   

[BigRedBuster]

55 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

 

So where is the proof Papadapoulos was involved in or knows anything about Trump colluding with Russia to fix the election?

Question.....did you know all evidence against Manafort before his trial where he was found guilty of a number of things?

[Ric Flair]

1 hour ago, commando said:

where is the proof there isn't any evidence of wrongdoing?   

 

That's not how our criminal justice system is supposed to work. That it seems to be exactly how the Mueller investigation is operating is precisely my point.

12 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Question.....did you know all evidence against Manafort before his trial where he was found guilty of a number of things?

 

Question....did any of the things he was found guilty of involve Trump or implicate Trump in any way?

[commando]

Just now, Ric Flair said:

 

That's not how our criminal justice system is supposed to work. That it seems to be exactly how the Mueller investigation is operating is precisely my point.

we are suppose to have all evidence before the investigation?

[Ric Flair]

Just now, commando said:

we are suppose to have all evidence before the investigation?

 

You are supposed to have solid evidence a crime was committed to justify starting the investigation.

[commando]

so all the guilty pleas from the investigation proves there was nothing there to start with?

[ZRod]

59 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

 

So where is the proof Papadapoulos was involved in or knows anything about Trump colluding with Russia to fix the election?

Funny you should ask...

 

Stolen from the front page of Reddit.

Man 'linked' between Trump campaign and Russia 'missing and may be dead

Quote

Authorities were alerted after Papadopoulos told an Australian diplomat during a drinking session in a London pub about his meetings with Mifsud.

Mifsud was lauded by the University of Stirling as part of its "diplomacy A-team", a globetrotting ambassador "flying the flag" for the Scottish institution. Allegations contained in federal indictments against Papadopoulos say that while Mifsud was working with Stirling, he was offering to cultivate his "substantial connections with Russian government officials" to deliver "thousands of emails" that would damage Mrs Clinton.

 

[BigRedBuster]

4 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

 

That's not how our criminal justice system is supposed to work. That it seems to be exactly how the Mueller investigation is operating is precisely my point.

 

Question....did any of the things he was found guilty of involve Trump or implicate Trump in any way?

 

 

That’s not answering my question. 

[Ric Flair]

8 hours ago, commando said:

so all the guilty pleas from the investigation proves there was nothing there to start with?

 

The investigation was supposedly about whether Trump and/or his campaign colluded with Russia to fix the election. Period.

 

Now that we're two years and tens of millions of dollars into this thing, is there any evidence whatsoever of that? 

[commando]

39 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

 

The investigation was supposedly about whether Trump and/or his campaign colluded with Russia to fix the election. Period.

 

Now that we're two years and tens of millions of dollars into this thing, is there any evidence whatsoever of that? 

where is the evidence that meuller doesn't have anything?

[Ric Flair]

27 minutes ago, commando said:

where is the evidence that meuller doesn't have anything?

 

If he does, then let's see it.

[Ulty]

10 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

You are supposed to have solid evidence a crime was committed to justify starting the investigation.

 

This is not even remotely true. Investigations can be justified by suspicion and good faith. "Solid evidence" is not a standard of proof, this is something you simply made up. A search warrant can be issued based on reasonable suspicion. An arrest can be made based on probable cause. Thorough investigations can certainly be conducted before either of these standards are reached. 

 

 

23 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

If he does, then let's see it.

 

It is simply fantasy to ask someone to release the evidence collected during an investigation before the evidence is completed. Mueller owes the American people a thorough investigation which will ultimately bear out the facts. He does not owe you or anybody else a sneak peak into his bag of tricks before he is done.

[funhusker]

1 hour ago, Ric Flair said:

 

The investigation was supposedly about whether Trump and/or his campaign colluded with Russia to fix the election. Period.

 

Now that we're two years and tens of millions of dollars into this thing, is there any evidence whatsoever of that? 

No, just no.  The investigation was conducted to see the involvement of Russian interference.  Investigating possible campaign involvement was a "subpoint".

 

You can read the letter here

 

The fact that Trump has made this investigation about him, is more of a reason common people should want to investigate him, in my opinion.