Jump to content


Republicans will attack the press as a campaign strategy for the 2018 mid-term elections


Recommended Posts

This is what you do when you can't govern. Distract, dissemble and deflect.

GOP strategists plot anti-media strategy for 2018 elections

Conservative radio hosts mock a physical assault on a reporter. A GOP governor blasts a reporter on Twitter as "a sick man." The president accuses the media of being an “enemy of the people.”

This is not run-of-the-mill Republican criticism of the press anymore. It is now a deliberate strategy to help GOP candidates win elections fueled by public hatred of reporters.

“Does anyone want to see a reporter badly injured? No,” said Tobe Berkovitz, a Boston University advertising expert who advises congressional and gubernatorial election campaigns. "But there are some people who think this is their comeuppance: ‘You’ve been strutting around with no accountability and maybe you should be held accountable.’”

A party that traditionally has had a fraught relationship with the media has become outright hostile, led by a president who picks more fights with journalists than any GOP leader since Richard Nixon.

But interviews with Republican strategists and party leaders across the country reveal that what started as genuine anger at allegedly unfair coverage — or an effort to deflect criticism — is now an integral part of next year’s congressional campaigns.

The hope, say these officials, is to convince Trump die-hards that these mid-term races are as much a referendum on the media as they are on President Trump. That means embracing conflict with local and national journalists, taking them on to show Republicans voters that they, just like the president, are battling a biased press corps out to destroy them.

 

At some point you'd have to hope that Republican voters would actually expect their party to govern, but until then, it appears they're willing to be entertained - and vote party line - based solely on all the anger these politicians can generate.

 

 

  • Fire 5
Link to comment

When your political fortunes hinge entirely on the ignorance of the electorate, then of course propaganda is the cornerstone of campaign strategy.

 

Whatever happened to encouraging people to go out there, get informed, and make their own decisions?

  • Fire 1
Link to comment

When your political fortunes hinge entirely on the ignorance of the electorate, then of course propaganda is the cornerstone of campaign strategy.

 

Whatever happened to encouraging people to go out there, get informed, and make their own decisions?

 

People don't want confirmation of facts, thoughts and ideas. They want affirmation. They want to feel that their thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs are validated, regardless if they're accurate or not.

  • Fire 4
Link to comment

 

When your political fortunes hinge entirely on the ignorance of the electorate, then of course propaganda is the cornerstone of campaign strategy.Whatever happened to encouraging people to go out there, get informed, and make their own decisions?

 

People don't want confirmation of facts, thoughts and ideas. They want affirmation. They want to feel that their thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs are validated, regardless if they're accurate or not.

Especially those beliefa that they feel down real deep but have been hesitant to say out loud ...

Link to comment

This is what you do when you can't govern. Distract, dissemble and deflect.

 

 

GOP strategists plot anti-media strategy for 2018 elections

 

Conservative radio hosts mock a physical assault on a reporter. A GOP governor blasts a reporter on Twitter as "a sick man." The president accuses the media of being an “enemy of the people.”

 

This is not run-of-the-mill Republican criticism of the press anymore. It is now a deliberate strategy to help GOP candidates win elections fueled by public hatred of reporters.

 

“Does anyone want to see a reporter badly injured? No,” said Tobe Berkovitz, a Boston University advertising expert who advises congressional and gubernatorial election campaigns. "But there are some people who think this is their comeuppance: ‘You’ve been strutting around with no accountability and maybe you should be held accountable.’”

 

A party that traditionally has had a fraught relationship with the media has become outright hostile, led by a president who picks more fights with journalists than any GOP leader since Richard Nixon.

 

But interviews with Republican strategists and party leaders across the country reveal that what started as genuine anger at allegedly unfair coverage — or an effort to deflect criticism — is now an integral part of next year’s congressional campaigns.

 

The hope, say these officials, is to convince Trump die-hards that these mid-term races are as much a referendum on the media as they are on President Trump. That means embracing conflict with local and national journalists, taking them on to show Republicans voters that they, just like the president, are battling a biased press corps out to destroy them.

 

At some point you'd have to hope that Republican voters would actually expect their party to govern, but until then, it appears they're willing to be entertained - and vote party line - based solely on all the anger these politicians can generate.

 

 

 

Honestly, how can anyone associate with this party any longer?

Link to comment

 

This is what you do when you can't govern. Distract, dissemble and deflect.

 

 

GOP strategists plot anti-media strategy for 2018 elections

 

Conservative radio hosts mock a physical assault on a reporter. A GOP governor blasts a reporter on Twitter as "a sick man." The president accuses the media of being an “enemy of the people.”

 

This is not run-of-the-mill Republican criticism of the press anymore. It is now a deliberate strategy to help GOP candidates win elections fueled by public hatred of reporters.

 

“Does anyone want to see a reporter badly injured? No,” said Tobe Berkovitz, a Boston University advertising expert who advises congressional and gubernatorial election campaigns. "But there are some people who think this is their comeuppance: ‘You’ve been strutting around with no accountability and maybe you should be held accountable.’”

 

A party that traditionally has had a fraught relationship with the media has become outright hostile, led by a president who picks more fights with journalists than any GOP leader since Richard Nixon.

 

But interviews with Republican strategists and party leaders across the country reveal that what started as genuine anger at allegedly unfair coverage — or an effort to deflect criticism — is now an integral part of next year’s congressional campaigns.

 

The hope, say these officials, is to convince Trump die-hards that these mid-term races are as much a referendum on the media as they are on President Trump. That means embracing conflict with local and national journalists, taking them on to show Republicans voters that they, just like the president, are battling a biased press corps out to destroy them.

 

At some point you'd have to hope that Republican voters would actually expect their party to govern, but until then, it appears they're willing to be entertained - and vote party line - based solely on all the anger these politicians can generate.

 

 

 

Honestly, how can anyone associate with this party any longer?

 

 

 

I asked tghusker this in a different thread and he never got back to me. When is enough enough if you still call yourself a Republican?

Link to comment

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...