Jump to content
seaofred92

2018 5* Matt Corral QB De-Commits from USC, Open To All Offers

Recommended Posts

BigRedN    339

@MattyIce, I'm a "C" all the way.  7-5 was my pre-season number.  I'd be elated to be 7-5 ... even more so now.  So, my thought was that he would make it through this season and after next year goes South we move to the next rebuilding cycle.  As always, it's not what I would hope for ... but it's what I thought would be a likely scenario.

Good question you posted.  +1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NM11046    2,035

Why is everybody going nutso about firing Reggie?  RBs have been fine - Bradley was a good get. 

 

Cav I get - I agree.  Langs I get (don't necessarily agree). Reggie???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xmas32    398

I think this will play itself out honestly.  If Nebraska $hit$ the bed this year we'll probably see most of the high profile recruits flip/struggle to fill up the rest of the class with "difference makers".  Elite kids wanna play for a winner and if Nebraska ain't winnin' this becomes a pretty easy decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
C N Red    1,364
5 hours ago, C N Red said:

What have you seen since they've been here makes you think that?? Mostly offensively. I can see some improvement in play on defense so i could see them being able to develop and deserve more time to prove themselves.

 

4 hours ago, Throw Dem Bones said:

 

That's why everyone should give Riley 1 more year. Let him fire Langs, Reggie and Cav. MR fired friends and brought in Diaco, Parrella and Donte which is really starting to pay off and hopefully that only continues. I'd be more than willing to wait 1 more year to see what happens when he fires more friends, and brings in a real OC, Line coach and RB coach. Plus that'll give our AD a year to get things going before making what will be the biggest potential fire/hire of his life. Talk about pressure for a new AD..

 

I am all about winning and winning now but anyone that thinks firing MR now/ at the end of the season and is expecting next year to be great is nuts. We have arguably the toughest schedule in college football in 2018. (As long as we go 7-5 or better this year) We might as well have a team with stability and that has had a full season to play in a new D and new offensive scheme vs a new coach with new systems again and possibly losing more recruits. 

If we fire all those guys it wont help our recruiting and we will be starting over again on offense. Cav needs to go but otherwise we just need Langs to run a more college friendly offense that can help our QBs out. Im not against giving Riley one more year but only if we compete with every team we play the rest of the year, beat Wisconsin, and finishing no worse than 7-5. If we are going to fire Langs, Reggie, and Cav we might as well start over completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warrior10    1,919
8 hours ago, MattyIce said:

Honest question:

 

Say we have a top 15 recruiting class heading into Iowa game. Say we go 7-5.

 

Are you:

 

A) Canning Riley

B) Waiting to can Riley until after NSD

C) Giving him another year

D) Convincing him to retire with a buyout before Spring Ball.

 

If we have a talented class, we must find a way to get them here.

Frankly, speculating a top 15 class seems unreasonable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ScottyIce    1,922
9 hours ago, Warrior10 said:

Frankly, speculating a top 15 class seems unreasonable.

 

It's not speculation.

 

It was a proposition; a what if, if you will.

 

Also, does it really seem "unreasonable" if it were a speculation? I mean maybe 15 is a little out of reach, but 20 isn't. There isn't a wide margin between 15-20.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stumpy1    1,683

It wouldn't be unreasonable to get top 15 if we land Carrol, Hall, Croswell and possibly Micah.   If we can get Carrol to flip,  it would pretty much get us Hall and Croswell.  We would just have to keep working Micah. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Warrior10    1,919
1 hour ago, MattyIce said:

 

It's not speculation.

 

It was a proposition; a what if, if you will.

 

Also, does it really seem "unreasonable" if it were a speculation? I mean maybe 15 is a little out of reach, but 20 isn't. There isn't a wide margin between 15-20.

Top 20 is the number I had in mind for a realistic goal. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×