2017 Returning Production

[BIG ERN]

 

Team	OFF % RET	Rk	Proj. PPG change (Off)	DEF % RET	Rk	Proj. PPG change (Def)	% RET	Rk
FIU	85%	14	2.9	85%	6	-3.6	85%	1
TCU	92%	5	3.3	77%	23	-2.2	85%	2
Oregon	76%	37	2.3	91%	3	-4.6	84%	3
FAU	91%	8	3.3	76%	27	-2.1	83%	4
Wake Forest	97%	1	3.4	69%	49	-0.9	83%	5
Texas	84%	15	2.9	80%	12	-2.8	82%	6
Kentucky	87%	12	3.1	76%	25	-2.1	81%	7
S. Carolina	91%	7	3.3	72%	44	-1.3	81%	8
Georgia	77%	35	2.4	85%	5	-3.6	81%	9
Vanderbilt	94%	3	3.4	68%	59	-0.6	81%	10
Tulane	81%	20	2.7	80%	14	-2.7	80%	11
EMU	92%	6	3.3	69%	52	-0.8	80%	12
Indiana	63%	67	0.8	96%	1	-5.4	79%	13
Colorado St.	84%	16	2.9	74%	34	-1.7	79%	14
UMass	74%	41	2.1	84%	7	-3.4	79%	15
Miami (OH)	82%	18	2.8	75%	31	-2	79%	16
Syracuse	64%	64	1	93%	2	-5	79%	17
UTSA	81%	19	2.7	74%	33	-1.8	78%	18
SMU	94%	2	3.4	59%	81	0.9	77%	19
App. St.	80%	23	2.7	72%	43	-1.3	76%	20
Iowa St.	86%	13	3.1	65%	66	0	75%	21
Stanford	76%	38	2.3	74%	36	-1.7	75%	22
Arizona	70%	47	1.7	79%	16	-2.6	75%	23
Troy	93%	4	3.4	56%	98	1.6	74%	24
Virginia	64%	62	1	84%	8	-3.4	74%	25
USF	71%	46	1.8	77%	21	-2.2	74%	26
Penn St.	79%	26	2.6	68%	55	-0.6	74%	27
ULM	79%	28	2.5	67%	63	-0.5	73%	28
Ga. Tech	62%	70	0.7	82%	10	-3.2	72%	29
Northwestern	67%	55	1.3	77%	22	-2.2	72%	30
Missouri	89%	10	3.2	54%	102	1.9	72%	31
BGSU	74%	42	2.1	69%	53	-0.8	71%	32
Nevada	61%	73	0.5	81%	11	-2.9	71%	33
NC St.	83%	17	2.9	58%	90	1.1	71%	34
Arizona St.	72%	45	1.9	70%	48	-0.9	71%	35
Kansas St.	79%	24	2.6	61%	77	0.6	70%	36
Army	66%	56	1.2	74%	35	-1.7	70%	37
NMSU	57%	87	0	83%	9	-3.2	70%	38
Florida St.	60%	79	0.4	80%	13	-2.8	70%	39
Oregon St.	77%	36	2.3	63%	70	0.2	70%	40
MTSU	81%	22	2.7	59%	83	0.9	70%	41
BC	67%	53	1.4	72%	42	-1.3	69%	42
Wash. St.	67%	54	1.4	72%	41	-1.3	69%	43
Memphis	87%	11	3.1	51%	109	2.5	69%	44
Louisville	58%	84	0.1	80%	15	-2.7	69%	45
Rutgers	60%	76	0.4	76%	29	-2	68%	46
Texas St.	68%	51	1.4	68%	58	-0.6	68%	47
Duke	79%	25	2.6	55%	100	1.6	67%	48
Oklahoma St.	78%	30	2.5	56%	97	1.5	67%	49
Florida	81%	21	2.7	53%	103	2	67%	50
CMU	60%	78	0.4	74%	37	-1.7	67%	51
Wisconsin	66%	58	1.2	68%	56	-0.6	67%	52
Cincinnati	70%	48	1.7	64%	68	0.1	67%	53
Oklahoma	60%	77	0.4	73%	40	-1.6	67%	54
SDSU	79%	27	2.6	53%	104	2	66%	55
Auburn	72%	43	1.9	60%	79	0.8	66%	56
Wyoming	45%	103	-2.1	87%	4	-4	66%	57
Utah St.	76%	39	2.3	56%	94	1.4	66%	58
North Texas	63%	65	0.8	69%	54	-0.8	66%	59
Rice	53%	92	-0.6	78%	19	-2.5	66%	60
UNLV	90%	9	3.2	41%	117	4.2	66%	61
Purdue	55%	89	-0.3	76%	30	-2	66%	62
Miss. St.	72%	44	1.9	59%	85	0.9	65%	63
Ark. St.	78%	29	2.5	50%	111	2.5	64%	64
UTEP	57%	86	0	71%	46	-1.1	64%	65
Georgia St.	65%	59	1.2	62%	72	0.3	64%	66
Marshall	50%	96	-1.1	76%	26	-2.1	63%	67
SJSU	51%	95	-1.1	76%	28	-2.1	63%	68
Ball St.	65%	60	1.1	62%	74	0.4	63%	69
Washington	75%	40	2.2	50%	110	2.5	63%	70
USC	58%	82	0.2	67%	61	-0.6	63%	71
Ohio St.	68%	50	1.5	57%	92	1.3	63%	72
Alabama	64%	61	1	59%	84	0.9	62%	73
Texas Tech	62%	69	0.8	59%	82	0.9	61%	74
Charlotte	63%	66	0.8	59%	86	1	61%	75
So. Miss	61%	72	0.6	60%	80	0.8	61%	76
ODU	51%	94	-1	69%	51	-0.8	60%	77
Hawaii	64%	63	1	56%	99	1.6	60%	78
Buffalo	47%	98	-1.7	71%	45	-1.2	59%	79
Fresno St.	77%	34	2.4	40%	121	4.5	58%	80
Toledo	68%	52	1.4	49%	113	2.8	58%	81
California	38%	111	-3.6	78%	18	-2.5	58%	82
Kansas	78%	31	2.4	38%	122	4.8	58%	83
UCF	78%	32	2.4	38%	123	4.8	58%	84
Maryland	38%	110	-3.5	77%	24	-2.1	57%	85
Notre Dame	58%	83	0.2	56%	96	1.5	57%	86
Temple	58%	85	0.1	56%	95	1.5	57%	87
UConn	60%	75	0.5	53%	105	2	57%	88
Akron	63%	68	0.8	51%	108	2.4	57%	89
Arkansas	55%	91	-0.4	58%	89	1.1	57%	90
Minnesota	45%	102	-2	68%	60	-0.6	57%	91
Va. Tech	34%	119	-4.5	79%	17	-2.5	56%	92
Baylor	45%	104	-2.2	67%	62	-0.5	56%	93
NIU	38%	112	-3.6	74%	39	-1.6	56%	94
Boise St.	60%	74	0.5	50%	112	2.6	55%	95
Houston	51%	93	-0.9	58%	91	1.1	55%	96
UL-Laf.	40%	108	-3.2	69%	50	-0.9	54%	97
Kent St.	62%	71	0.6	47%	114	3.1	54%	98
UCLA	68%	49	1.5	40%	120	4.5	54%	99
WKU	46%	101	-1.9	62%	75	0.4	54%	100
Ohio	41%	107	-3	67%	64	-0.5	54%	101
Colorado	77%	33	2.4	29%	126	6.6	53%	102
Navy	32%	122	-5	74%	38	-1.7	53%	103
S. Alabama	46%	100	-1.9	58%	88	1.1	52%	104
Tulsa	29%	124	-5.6	75%	32	-1.9	52%	105
BYU	34%	118	-4.4	70%	47	-0.9	52%	106
Texas A&M	39%	109	-3.3	64%	67	0	52%	107
Illinois	50%	97	-1.2	53%	106	2	51%	108
Tennessee	42%	106	-2.8	61%	78	0.6	51%	109
Ole Miss	37%	115	-3.8	63%	71	0.2	50%	110
LSU	59%	80	0.3	40%	119	4.4	50%	111
Idaho	56%	88	-0.2	43%	116	3.8	50%	112
ECU	37%	113	-3.7	61%	76	0.5	49%	113
New Mexico	66%	57	1.2	33%	125	5.8	49%	114
Utah	59%	81	0.3	37%	124	4.9	48%	115
Coastal Caro.	55%	90	-0.3	41%	118	4.3	48%	116
Clemson	32%	121	-4.8	62%	73	0.4	47%	117
Iowa	27%	125	-6.2	68%	57	-0.6	47%	118
WMU	15%	129	-9.5	78%	20	-2.4	46%	119
Miami	37%	114	-3.7	55%	101	1.7	46%	120
Ga. Southern	35%	117	-4.2	57%	93	1.3	46%	121
Nebraska	26%	127	-6.3	65%	65	-0.1	46%	122
Pittsburgh	44%	105	-2.3	44%	115	3.7	44%	123
Mich. St.	35%	116	-4.2	52%	107	2.2	44%	124
La. Tech	26%	126	-6.3	59%	87	1	43%	125
N. Carolina	19%	128	-8.4	64%	69	0.1	41%	126
Michigan	46%	99	-1.8	22%	128	7.9	34%	127
WVU	30%	123	-5.3	25%	127	7.2	28%	128
Air Force	33%	120	-4.7	18%	129	8.6	25%	129

(Note: This list does not include FBS newcomer UAB, which is starting from scratch.)

[BigRedBuster]

Do you have a link to where you got that from?

[Nebfanatic]

This to me is what makes this team so intriguing and hard to predict. It's nearly a brand new squad compared to a year ago

[Scratchtown]

Well and the other thing is the NU has a QB that is a far more competent passer than what they had last year. 

 

Good thing this sort of thing doesn't matter in games because it would be a long year for NU being that far down the list! 

[84HuskerLaw]

When you graduate your 4 year starter at QB and several of his favorite receivers and the 'starting' RB (although he may not have been significantly better than those behind him), you would expect this sort of statistical result.  But, if you are expecting better production from those you are replacing, then there is plenty of reason for optimism and these numbers will not likely be indicative of the upcoming season results.  

 

 

[JJ Husker]

I prefer the glass is half full approach.....It's not only 26% production returning but rather 74% lack of production that is not returning.

[BIG ERN]

14 hours ago, 84HuskerLaw said:

When you graduate your 4 year starter at QB and several of his favorite receivers and the 'starting' RB (although he may not have been significantly better than those behind him), you would expect this sort of statistical result.  But, if you are expecting better production from those you are replacing, then there is plenty of reason for optimism and these numbers will not likely be indicative of the upcoming season results.  

 

 

I agree to this for the most part. We lost a lot of SRs, but only 1 of them was drafted (last pick 5th round). Tanner Lee and the LB core are the two main keys for this upcoming season. 

[GBRFAN]

20 hours ago, 84HuskerLaw said:

When you graduate your 4 year starter at QB and several of his favorite receivers and the 'starting' RB (although he may not have been significantly better than those behind him), you would expect this sort of statistical result.  But, if you are expecting better production from those you are replacing, then there is plenty of reason for optimism and these numbers will not likely be indicative of the upcoming season results.  

 

 

 

POLL Question: Do we prefer longer post or short post in BOLD?

 

 

[BigRedBuster]

10 minutes ago, GBRFAN said:

 

POLL Question: Do we prefer longer post or short post in BOLD?

 

 

SHORT

This is the first post of his I've read in about 6 months.