Redux Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 The defense was billed as better than holding Arky st to 30+ points. The defense was not good. They ran the same play roughly half the game and had like 75% success rate with it. 2 Quote Link to comment
BoNeyard Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 If you were toying and playing vanilla defense all game long to try and "hide" something from Oregon, then I would hope we'd say enough is enough when Arkansas State is down 14 and about to score to make it a one score game within the final minutes. Then I would hope if Arkansas State gets the onside kick we would really turn up the defense to make sure they got nowhere close to scoring or tying the game. IMO, the hiding playbooks to keep things secretive against future opponents is hogwash, and it certainly shouldn't and wouldn't apply when you may lose a game. 4 Quote Link to comment
HuskerInLostWages Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, zoogs said: You know that wasn't the defense. Why would you play vanilla like it's a scrimmage? I don't know. Kind of puzzling mindset. Doesn't portend well. But it wasn't the defense. 8 minutes left in a 2-score game...you need to score. Hopefully we plug those faucets If that's our defense, anyone with a pulse is going to destroy us(pretty much the same the last 10 years or so). We ran the same defense the whole game except for may a total of 5 plays. I'm not well versed on the 3-4 defense, but if that is the only thing it offers, I was it gone immediately. 2 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 Lee threw passes that would have made Armstrong blush. Receivers dropped sure catches.. we ran straight at the line expecting a result other than a minimal gain... But...the MAC crew did royally screw us on like 3 big calls. 3 Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Of course it's not the only thing it offers. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 I knew we weren't "there" this year, but I didn't think we were actually going to struggle to win 8 games. I'm honestly worried. 2 Quote Link to comment
hskrfan4life Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 This is only Week One. Don't overreact to Week one. Biggest improvements happen between week one and week two. 2 Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 8 minutes ago, 1995 Redux said: They just look so damn vunerable in every faucet... 7 Quote Link to comment
DrunkOffPunch Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 Just now, hskrfan4life said: This is only Week One. Don't overreact to Week one. Biggest improvements happen between week one and week two. The biggest improvement being the opposing team. But I agree it's a bit too early to overreact. 1 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 1 minute ago, hskrfan4life said: This is only Week One. Don't overreact to Week one. Biggest improvements happen between week one and week two. Yeah. But normally we have another scrub to hammer things out against. We barely prevented OT against a Sun Belt squad and have Oregon on the road in a week. sh#t... Quote Link to comment
HuskerInLostWages Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, zoogs said: Of course it's not the only thing it offers. Well i'm guessing that's pretty obvious, what I'm saying is we sure didn't see anything different tonight, in fact we saw it being worse than what we saw last season. I certainly hope Diaco has something else to show us or he will spend a very short time here in Lincoln. 1 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 Our secondary looked like it had no clue what to do. That is going to be a massive problem next week, let's not sugarcoat it. 5 Quote Link to comment
hskrfan4life Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 1 minute ago, 1995 Redux said: Yeah. But normally we have another scrub to hammer things out against. We barely prevented OT against a Sun Belt squad and have Oregon on the road in a week. sh#t... And Oregon is Alabama. Got it. Having a game like this gives the coaches the weaknesses and gives them ability to fix those before game two. Just going to have to wait and see. Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted September 3, 2017 Author Share Posted September 3, 2017 Just now, hskrfan4life said: And Oregon is Alabama. Got it. Having a game like this gives the coaches the weaknesses and gives them ability to fix those before game two. Just going to have to wait and see. Alabama played #3. We played #93 2 Quote Link to comment
hskrfan4life Posted September 3, 2017 Share Posted September 3, 2017 1 minute ago, 1995 Redux said: Alabama played #3. We played #93 I was saying that you thinking it's going to be a sh#tstorm this week. It's Oregon, with a new head coach. They have speed. Just wait and see my man and try not to overreact. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.