Mavric Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 Quote Meyer said it drives him "insane" when coaches blame players they inherited from a previous staff. The coach particularly took issue with Tom Herman at Texas and Will Muschamp, formerly at Florida and now at South Carolina. Meyer pointed to a statement made Saturday by Herman (his former offensive coordinator at Ohio State) not being able to "sprinkle fairy dust" on the Longhorns team he inherited from Charlie Strong (Meyer's former defensive coordinator at Florida) following a loss to Maryland. Meyer also said Muschamp "blamed us for Florida," referring to a perceived lack of talent left for Muschamp when Meyer departed before the 2011 season. "C'mon man. I don't know where that came from," Meyer told CBS Sports. "It's like a new generation of excuse. [Herman] said, 'I can't rub pixie dust on this thing.' He got a dose of reality. Maryland just scored 51 points on you." CBS Quote Link to comment
jaws Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/urban-meyer-driven-insane-by-herman-muschamp-blaming-inherited-players/amp/ Quote "That's like, when I got here, everybody wanted me to say Jim Tressel left the cupboard bare," Meyer continued. "If I heard any assistant coach [say that], they'd be gone. You're done. "Those are your players. I hear TV guys [say], 'Wait until they get their own players in there.' They're our players. What do you mean 'their players?' The minute you sign a contract, they're your players. "You didn't choose me, I chose you. You're mine, absolutely. I love you, and I'm going to kick the sh#t out of you, and we're going to do it right … "[Blaming players] drives me insane." I know most (ok, all) of you guys don't like Urban, but he made some strong statements towards Herman and Muschamp in this article. If nothing else, it was an interesting read for me. 2 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 7, 2017 Author Share Posted September 7, 2017 I had posted that in the general College Football thread but I merged them together now. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 I like Urban's point, but I don't think it's all that black and white. Coaching transitions can be really tough and I think it takes an elite coach or really good circumstances to have immediate success in year one. Immediate success can certainly have different definitions depending on one's perspective. Some may view it as an excuse, but I think Riley is a good example. I don't think there's any question NU had depth issues in certain areas after BP left, and I don't think his philosophy mixed with the current talent on the team came together overly well. So, I think not having the right players or good enough players can matter, but the coach and their philosophy can also matter too. 1 Quote Link to comment
NUinID Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 The things is Jim Tressel didn't leave the cupboard bare at OSU. It was just undercoached by Luke Fickle. The cupboard doesn't go bare after 1 season. Urban is a good coach still doesn't mean I like him. He makes my skin crawl. He always seems fake, to me. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted September 7, 2017 Share Posted September 7, 2017 Urban's blowing this up a little bit more than necessary, and he was given a pretty stacked and loaded roster at OSU, but you've gotta love his perspective. It's always easy to hate on coaches that are so ridiculously successful, but Urban seems like one of the good guys. Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted September 8, 2017 Share Posted September 8, 2017 Sounds like Urbs doesn't understand anything about toxins. 2 Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 9, 2017 Share Posted September 9, 2017 It's only logical that if a coach is changing offense or defensive schemes, things might go better after they have some recruiting classes of their own. It's just wrong for coaches themselves to use inherited players as an excuse. Quote Link to comment
Savage Husker Posted September 10, 2017 Share Posted September 10, 2017 All of his championships (or programs pinnacle seasons) have come within the first four years of arriving, using the majority of the previous coaching staffs players. It's no wonder he takes this stance. Since arriving in Columbus I have been curious what type of coach Urban would be at one school over a longer tenure than 6 seasons. He has twice immediately moved on when he guided a program to their pinnacle and then quit coaching when Florida tanked and was turning into a criminal dumpster fire. He is a great coach, an obvious hall of fame coach, but we still haven't seen what he can do with a program over an extended period of time - with his own players. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.