Tristian Gebbia - YES or NO

[Mavric]

3 minutes ago, teachercd said:

I would imagine he could not have been much worse.  Was tonight the worst Husker QB performance maybe...ever?

 

3 4 picks

Under 50%

No yards rushing

 

FIFY

[grandpasknee]

Just now, Hollywoodhusker83 said:

I'm not trying to suggest a QB change. I'm just thinking that if we stick with this offense in the future, we'll be in good hands with Tristian. 

 

If the QB accuracy was 5% better, we win this game. 

Have you compared tape, spring performance, and considered one year of scout team experience (and experience in MR's system) the POB has to Gebbia, and if so, what specific defects does POB have, or where does Gebbia have the upper hand?   I am all for having one of the become our starter this year, but I'm def not ready to pull the plug on Tanner Lee, and I'm not enough of an expert to judge between POB and Gebbia.

[Pedro Guerrero]

7 minutes ago, teachercd said:

I would imagine he could not have been much worse.  Was tonight the worst Husker QB performance maybe...ever?

 

3 picks

Under 50%

No yards rushing

 

Tommy against Iowa in 2015 was pretty bad.  4 picks and 0 tds.

 

Im sure Joe Dailey had something that would rival today.

 

Today was bad though.

 

[Hollywoodhusker83]

I do think it's possible we don't have the WR talent we need yet. I mean, Stanley Morgan seemed to be the only main target. Even last year with our WR's we would have lit it up. Sorta bummer that Lindsey didn't do much today

[Vitalis Jackson]

Quite honestly, Tommy Armstrong probably would have won this game today. And I was no fan of Tommy Armstrong. Time to be honest, coach. Bench Tanner, bring up the next in line for competition.

[Pedro Guerrero]

31 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

Well, that don't make no sense.

 

1,000,000 yards and 7TDs would mean we had a crapton of turnovers and field goal tries.

 

Penatlies

[krc1995]

33 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

Well, that don't make no sense.

 

1,000,000 yards and 7TDs would mean we had a crapton of turnovers and field goal tries.

Yup, its not mathematically sound.  Come on Pedro!

[Pedro Guerrero]

5 minutes ago, krc1995 said:

Yup, its not mathematically sound.  Come on Pedro!

 

Fine 8 tds 

 

[Mavric]

14 minutes ago, Hollywoodhusker83 said:

I do think it's possible we don't have the WR talent we need yet. I mean, Stanley Morgan seemed to be the only main target. Even last year with our WR's we would have lit it up. Sorta bummer that Lindsey didn't do much today

 

Odd that in three years of this great recruiting upgrade we went from possibly the best group of receivers we've ever had to a nearly-bare cupboard.

[gobiggergoredder]

Save a year of eligibility for the next coach.

 

I vote NO.

[TonyStalloni]

55 minutes ago, Mavric said:

 

Odd that in three years of this great recruiting upgrade we went from possibly the best group of receivers we've ever had to a nearly-bare cupboard.

Leave it to Bo to recruit all the good receivers and tight ends in one class. 

[ColoradoHusk]

1 hour ago, Mavric said:

 

Odd that in three years of this great recruiting upgrade we went from possibly the best group of receivers we've ever had to a nearly-bare cupboard.

But our receivers are gorillas!!!

[famoustitles]

1 hour ago, Mavric said:

 

Odd that in three years of this great recruiting upgrade we went from possibly the best group of receivers we've ever had to a nearly-bare cupboard.

Best group of receivers we've ever had is quite the stretch. Not 1 made an NFL roster

[Mavric]

3 minutes ago, famoustitles said:

Best group of receivers we've ever had is quite the stretch. Not 1 made an NFL roster

 

Um ..two of them did and a third probably still will.

[famoustitles]

34 minutes ago, Mavric said:

 

Um ..two of them did and a third probably still will.

53 man roster?