brophog Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 3 minutes ago, 4skers89 said: The plan is for him to do well enough not to get fired but not good enough for Herman to keep his job. The next coach will bring in Langsdorf. It's an intricate plan yet deviously simple. It would follow the pattern. This is what you get or messing with us, Texas. Quote Link to comment
husker98 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 12 minutes ago, 4skers89 said: The plan is for him to do well enough not to get fired but not good enough for Herman to keep his job. The next coach will bring in Langsdorf. It's an intricate plan yet deviously simple. yes please. Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 20 hours ago, Nebhawk said: To be fair to anyone in this world, they need an opportunity to prove themselves. In other words, until someone give them a chance they will always be unproven. Don't forget TO was just an OC for Devaney, with no HC experience. So I have always thought that either you have it or you don't. I often wonder who was available back then that we could have hired instead of TO? TO inherited a team that had won two NCs in the three years before he became HC. TO didn't even win his first outright conference championship until year nine. Let that sink in for a minute. It seems we all like to play the who could we have got back in 97/98. Why don't we ever play who could we have got back in 72/73? How many NCs might we have built up by now with a different hire? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.