Jump to content


Nonqualifiers & Scholly limit


Recommended Posts

I've seen a few people say that signing players that don't qualify counts towards the scholly limit. How does that work?

 

Do you lose it for a year even though no one is using it?

Can you give it to a walk-on for a semester?

Why can't you just go get another player that didn't sign on national signing day?

 

I don't get it.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Those are two kind of different things but are closely related.  There are rules for how many guys you can sign which basically assumes that you are giving a scholarship to everyone who signs.  So how many you can sign is a function of how many guys that are still on the team are on scholarship.  You can have up to 85 scholarship players and can over-sign by 3 in February so current scholarship players plus the number you have signed in February is a max of 88.  I think you are also only supposed to be able to sign 25 in a given class but that number is flexible because early enrollees can be counted back towards the previous class.

 

The actual scholarship limit of 85 only comes into effect when guys actually make it to campus.  That's why you can over-sign by 3 (88) as long as you're back down to 85 by the time most guys show up in June.  It gives you a little wiggle room as you usually have a couple guys decide to transfer after spring practice.  But if someone you signed doesn't actually make it to campus, that scholarship is available to someone else.  It either helps you get down to 85 or can be given to a walk-on or transfer.  The only time you actually lose a scholarship is if the player enrolls in classes and then leaves school for some reason.  Once they start classes for the semester, their scholarship can't be given to anyone else.  This happened a couple years ago (Suttles?) where the guy was here for a week and then left but no one could use that scholarship for that semester.

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

FWIW, I don't know if this means you can circumnavigate the rules... 

 

but technically prospects don't ever have to sign an NLI. I wonder if this rule is moot if we just have kids stop signing. 

 

For context: https://sports.vice.com/en_us/article/pgn38z/why-top-ncaa-recruits-shouldnt-sign-national-letters-of-intent

 

I wonder if said rule applies equally to non-NLI but signed financial support documents.

Edited by Atbone95
  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...