Jump to content


Stormy Daniels vs. The Donald


Recommended Posts


13 minutes ago, knapplc said:

It would be interesting to see which news items Fox covers more than CNN & MSNBC.

Hillary Clinton emails,

Uranium One,

Clinton Foundation.  

Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Right after I posted the Vox I saw this story. Takes a different view  - from a Pro - Trump perspective.

 

 

https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/rich-noyes/2018/05/08/media-get-trumped-presidents-polls-improve-despite-90-negative
 

Quote

 

Network coverage of those topics, plus a host of other smaller controversies involving the President, was almost entirely negative: of the 598 statements we tallied about Trump’s personal controversies or scandals, virtually all of them (579, or 97%) were negative.


 

 

trumpmay8.jpg?itok=zaLcCYrD

 

Link to comment
13 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

of the 598 statements we tallied about Trump’s personal controversies or scandals, virtually all of them (579, or 97%) were negative.

 

I mean... what did they expect? "Scandals" are rarely going to be covered positively.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

I mean... what did they expect? "Scandals" are rarely going to be covered positively.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah.....that's like saying 92.7% of the 352 stories about food were talking about what people eat.

 

I guess my next question is.  When Fox DOES cover these topics, are their stories positive about them?

"In other news tonight, Trump's lawyer paid a porn star $130,000 in hush money during the campaign.  We want to congratulate Donald Trump on his ability to solicit sex from a woman who does it for a living.  We are proud to be American.  He clearly has the ability to negotiate with anyone"

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

9 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

Yeah.....that's like saying 92.7% of the 352 stories about food were talking about what people eat.

 

I guess my next question is.  When Fox DOES cover these topics, are their stories positive about them?

"In other news tonight, Trump's lawyer paid a porn star $130,000 in hush money during the campaign.  We want to congratulate Donald Trump on his ability to solicit sex from a woman who does it for a living.  We are proud to be American.  He clearly has the ability to negotiate with anyone"

 

I imagine that's exactly how that coverage went. :D

Link to comment
20 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

I mean... what did they expect? "Scandals" are rarely going to be covered positively.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

yep - if Trump could keep himself out of trouble there would be no negative coverage.  But that in itself should be an indictment against fox news. 

Link to comment
  • 5 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

This story went by the wayside a bit, but it's back in the public eye again thanks to a very odd arrest in Ohio.

 

Seems Ms. Daniels does stripping when she isn't cavorting with the likes of Donald Trump, and this allegedly happened:

 

Quote

 

Trump accuser Stormy Daniels arrested in Ohio strip club 'for letting patrons touch her'

 

Stormy Daniels, the adult film star at the centre of allegations against Donald Trump, has been arrested at a strip club in Ohio.

 

Ms Daniels' lawyer said she was performing at the Sirens club when some patrons touched her in a "non-sexual" way. She was later arrested at the club under an Ohio state law banning anyone who isn't a family member from touching a nude or semi-nude dancer.

 

Mr Avenatti described the arrest as "a complete set-up". "It's absurd that law enforcement resources are being spent to conduct a sting operation related to customers touching performers in a strip club in a non-sexual manner," he said.

 

Neither the club nor the Columbus police commented on the arrest. Ms Daniels, who was semi-nude, allegedly touched some of the patrons' breasts according to charging documents filed in court and obtained by WSYX -TV. 

 

Ms Daniels was released on bail before 6am Thursday. Court records show she posted $6,000 bail. Ms Daniels is set for to face arraignment on Friday on three misdemeanour counts of touching a patron at a “sexually oriented” business. 

 

 

 

Because, apparently, it's unusual for a stripper to touch clients in Ohio.

 

There's a law on the books prohibiting this, actually.

 

It hasn't been enforced in ten years. 

 

 

 

 

Which leads to questions, like this one:

 

 

 

As noted in the tweet above, charges against Ms. Daniels were thrown out today

  • Plus1 4
Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...