cheekygeek Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Toe said: Man, this thread took a nosedive straight into the s#!tter, didn't it? https://media.giphy.com/media/4tvjRdqxRNCEg/giphy.gif Quote Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 I don't blame Osborne one bit for hiring either Solich or Pelini at the time. No one could have known they would have not panned out the way they did. I'd say overall he's someone who's opinion I would most definitely trust. No one is perfect. 2 1 Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 Solich was a pretty common sense hire. He was on the headset probably for 15 years and knew how Osborne called games. If it isn’t broke don’t fix it, etc. And Devaney handed the reigns to Osborne which worked out pretty well. The Solich hire made sense, imo. 1 1 Quote Link to comment
It'sNotAFakeID Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 5 hours ago, KingBlank said: Ya you watched that for the last 3 years. How did that go? We didn't watch discipline for the last 3 years. Quote Link to comment
Toe Posted September 13, 2018 Share Posted September 13, 2018 1 hour ago, Moiraine said: was the breakfast actually big and red I think it could be fairly described as large, but to be honest I think it was really more of a scarlet. Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 58 minutes ago, Husker_Bohunk said: Except for that whole...it wasn't Osborne's place to hire his replacement, that was his boss' job. $Bill. It was his place if his boss let him do it. Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted September 14, 2018 Share Posted September 14, 2018 Tom Osborne is a gentleman and diplomat. That's why he uses words like "maybe" "pretty" and "little bit" so much. I think college football itself was changing and getting far more competitive post 2000, and it was almost physically impossible for Frank Solich to maintain Tom Osborne's run. I think recruiting was sliding under Solich, and Jamal Lord was making the system look too predictable. But I'm going to go out on a limb and say that another 10 years of Frank Solich would maybe have looked a little bit better and pretty preferable over what we ended up with. All but one of Frank Solich's seasons would have been acceptable on Tom Osborne's resume. Tom knows that, and his endorsement of Solich isn't necessarily being defensive. He has a case. Osborne made major adjustments to his offensive schemes and recruiting philosophy when he was on the hotseat — twice — so there's no saying Solich wouldn't have done the same. We'll never know. I think Tom is big on this Scott Frost kid. Let's see how that goes. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.