Jump to content

Join the HuskerBoard Donor Team - Discounts on Tickets and Gear!

Click here to lend your support to: Save Chisholm Dairy Farm and make a donation at www.pledgie.com !
Save Chisholm Dairy Farm

Tommie Frazier elected to the College Football Hall of Fame!

Bucky

Member Since 02 Oct 2011
Offline Last Active Today, 11:04 AM
***--

Posts I've Made

In Topic: B1G Head-to-Head Records

14 May 2013 - 11:36 PM

View Postkchusker_chris, on 14 May 2013 - 10:32 AM, said:

View PostStPaulHusker, on 14 May 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:

Wisconsin was for sure going to be a great rivalry with BB as coach. Now? Who knows?

In the same way that Colorado was a "great" rivalry. I could care less about Wisconsin. They are the #4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year.


More like a 3-4 team every year:

Averages since 1993:

Big Ten Standings: Fourth (4.05)
Rankings among conference teams at close of season: 3.95
Standings to determine the Championship: Fourth (3.75)

In those seasons we've won the conference six times - more CC's than Nebraska won in that period.

Big Ten Championships since 1993:
Ohio State - 9
Wisconsin - 6
Michigan - 5
Northwestern -3
Iowa - 2
Michigan State - 1
Penn State - 1
Purdue - 1
Illinois - 1

So you can cast Wisconsin off as a "#4 or #5 team in the conference in any given year" but right now Nebraska has way more to prove in this conference than UW. As far as being a rival, I won't say that I "couldn't care less" about the Nebraska game because its a conference game and I always care but its no where near being a rivalry. Minnesota and Iowa are our historic rivals while lately the Michigan State games have been much more entertaining than the Nebraska showings... I'd even say that, at least on an emotional level, I care more about beating Illinois and Northwestern every year, so I agree with the sentiment there.

That's a Wisconsin fan's perspective, now as a Nebraska fan, why you wouldn't want us as a rival (in the sense that a person could "want" a rival), especially given the last two seasons, kind of escapes me. If we're going East/West then you're pretty much stuck with us and Iowa and if you care more about Iowa well...have fun with that.

In Topic: Whose 2012 season would you rather have?

13 May 2013 - 10:51 AM

View PostBye Bye Big XII, on 13 May 2013 - 10:25 AM, said:

View PostBucky, on 13 May 2013 - 10:04 AM, said:

View PostBye Bye Big XII, on 13 May 2013 - 07:55 AM, said:


Do you realize that the fact that Illinois has been to as many BCS bowls as Nebraska has been to over the past x years doesn't mean anything? Illinois was garbage, period, end of story.

By the way, I've been over our season since the second week in January. It's not bitterness.


My point is that Illinois is more than capable of not being "garbage". They've been to two BCS bowls and won five national championships. They have a winning records against UW, Indiana and Purdue. Wisconsin lost a ton of talent and coaching going into 2012 and while pre-season favorites they still had to fight hard for their berth. They were, in no way, some juggernaut assured tickets to Indiana as the five losses show.

Now I agree, Illinois did turn out to be "garbage" in 2012 but that was far from decided going into the year and part of that "garbage" season involved UW winning their game. We still had to compete against those teams and win our way, though that way was significantly shorter through no fault of our own...

As far as the whole bitterness thing, I think that it is a matter of bitterness whether you realize it or want to admit it or not. Had Nebraska won the CCG I bet that few if any Husker fans would be wondering if their season had been "tainted" by not playing Ohio State a second time. That is of course a personal opinion, I understand that you don't agree and thats perfectly fine.


I get what you're saying. Illinois has that capacity to be good. But since the turn of the millenium, Illinois has gone 5-6, 10-2, 5-7, 1-11, 3-8, 2-9, 2-10, 9-4, 5-7, 3-9, 7-6, and 7-6. Two seasons where they have finished ranked. One BCS appearance.

Wisconsin won the right to play in the conference championship game. Would they have had every B1G been eligible? No, but that's besides the point. They got there and won. Was the road there easier? Most definitely. Did the easier road to the championship game affect the outcome of the conference championship game? I don't think, from our perspective, that that can be determined.

Some Husker fans may be bitter about that, I'm not.


We're pretty much in agreement, I just don't think that the competition can be so easlily dismissed especially given how much UW lost last year. I'll go further than you're willing to go and see that the easier road probably did affect the championship game. All five of our losses preceding the CCG were by less than a touchdown and four were by three points, we could've had a much better season but I feel like some of those losses, especially OSU and PSU, happened because we were preparing for the CCG. I'm fine with saying that because I believe it to be true and I still don't think it taints our championship.

In Topic: Whose 2012 season would you rather have?

13 May 2013 - 10:04 AM

View PostBye Bye Big XII, on 13 May 2013 - 07:55 AM, said:


Do you realize that the fact that Illinois has been to as many BCS bowls as Nebraska has been to over the past x years doesn't mean anything? Illinois was garbage, period, end of story.

By the way, I've been over our season since the second week in January. It's not bitterness.


My point is that Illinois is more than capable of not being "garbage". They've been to two BCS bowls and won five national championships. They have a winning records against UW, Indiana and Purdue. Wisconsin lost a ton of talent and coaching going into 2012 and while pre-season favorites they still had to fight hard for their berth. They were, in no way, some juggernaut assured tickets to Indiana as the five losses show.

Now I agree, Illinois did turn out to be "garbage" in 2012 but that was far from decided going into the year and part of that "garbage" season involved UW winning their game. We still had to compete against those teams and win our way, though that way was significantly shorter through no fault of our own...

As far as the whole bitterness thing, I think that it is a matter of bitterness whether you realize it or want to admit it or not. Had Nebraska won the CCG I bet that few if any Husker fans would be wondering if their season had been "tainted" by not playing Ohio State a second time. That is of course a personal opinion, I understand that you don't agree and thats perfectly fine.

In Topic: Whose 2012 season would you rather have?

13 May 2013 - 01:14 AM

View PostBye Bye Big XII, on 12 May 2013 - 11:43 PM, said:

View Posthusker_99, on 12 May 2013 - 10:03 PM, said:

View Postaccountability, on 12 May 2013 - 09:48 PM, said:

View Posthusker_99, on 12 May 2013 - 08:41 PM, said:

If Michigan and Michigan St weren't eligible and we got in to the championship game cause of it i wouldn't call it a fluke.

Yes. Yes you would. You would piss and moan about it all the same.

Once again you made an ass out of yourself. Now if last second both Ohio St and Penn St were declared ineligible at the end of the season then yes that would be a fluke that Wisconsin got in but if you knew about it all season they just took advantage of the situation. They still had other teams to compete against to earn it. If we were in the same situation and won the conference championship game then we earned a trip to the rose bowl.


Like big bad Indiana, Illinois and Purdue?


Fun fact: Illinois has been to just as many BCS Bowls as Nebraska.

Not that any of this debate even matters - its all just bitterness from the loss. Had Nebraska beat Wisconsin in the Championship game none of this would be discussed but since Wisconsin won some fans have to try to get a dig in.

A championship is "tainted" by some kind of scandal or cheating by the team that won the title, not by the teams that didn't. Wisconsin's title isn't tainted by Ohio State and Penn State's problems - those are problems at those schools.

Did the Falcons "not really win" the NFC South because Sean Payton was barred from coaching the Saints?

In Topic: Whose 2012 season would you rather have?

11 May 2013 - 11:19 AM

View Postirafreak, on 11 May 2013 - 10:50 AM, said:

It's hard to argue that Wisconsin's season wasn't a success. I mean they fired coaches early in the season, lost close games, won a title and had to replace their superstar qb. Am I still a bit bitter about that title game...sure...I mean you get to rest your team for several weeks and scheme for the title game because the top two teams in your division were ineligible.

Nebraska's season was up and down too. Although the only real low that Wisconsin had was a bunch of losses that were close. We managed to pull out our many close games.

Since I have to pick one, I'll take ours. Wisconsin's season feels tainted and underachieving...ours just feels underachieving...


It doesn't feel like either of those things to me at all. Wisconsin had a terrific end to the season and was much better than I expected. I got to see Alvarez coach again in a Rose Bowl I didn't expect us to reach in a season where we lost loads of talent and coaches. We may have underachieved compared to the last few years but we overachieved when measured against most fans' expectations at the beginning of the season.

As far as it being "tainted" I think that's something felt more by OSU, PSU and maybe some Nebraska fans, who feel they were somehow screwed out of the title. It felt great to me.