I spent many years in corporate america doing recruiting, interviewing, hiring and placing of employees. Early in my career, I always hired the person with the most impressive resume and the who was the most impressive on the interview. I was highly swayed by high GPA's, training, credentials their performance at previous companies (sales figures, etc) The results were mixed---had some good hires and had some bad ones---just like the rest of the people in the company Gradually, I shifted to a model where I tried to find the best fit for a particular position/job and looked for unique skill set and experience in the candidates. This also involved doing
a careful evaluation of the needs of the company/department and of that particular position. The results were off the chart and I quickly become the best in the entire company (F500 Global) I have every reason to believe that SE did a very careful evaluation of our program--where we had been, where we are going, what the strengths were, what the challenges were---I think he has been doing this for some time and then he went out and found a candidate that matched those needs--and that candidate was Coach Riley Was he the best? Depends on how you define best? was he the best for our team? I believe the answer is yes--at least among the available pool of candidates