SkullandBones

Could not have put it better. Although I'd go on to say that Pelini has to take the Lion's share of the blame, this is all on him. Yeah Watson needs to go, but this team wasn't prepared at all. It's time to re-evaluate this entire staff, starting with the Head Man. This aint NU football, not by any stretch.

Wow. He may actually be the king of unflattering posters.

No. I certainly wasn't talking to you when I said that. I was debating the definition of sport with you, something that is so completely subjective you're never going to find any kind of consensus on it, regardless of who you talk to. Did not know the whole 'disport' thing btw, that was informative. I think - and a fairly significant number of others - think auto racing is a sport. You - and a fairly significant number of others - don't. Oh well, we disagree. Some people actually watch soccer, which I find unbelieveable. But, more power to 'em. I was refering to foppa who said: "NAASCAR = WWE = Not a real sport. I understand why so many rednecks watch it though...the ones that can actually afford a TV (or steal one, or sell one of their 16 children to get one) appreciate that they only need to use half of the 2 braincells they have left to watch a car do circles for 9 hours straight. I think even science-experiment monkeys would get bored of this, but oh well. NASSCAR should never be on TV unless it is in the weekday noon soap opera time slot, and should NEVER be mentioned as a debate as to whether it should be on instead of College football, NFL, high school football, Canadian football, my next-door neighbor kids playing touch football, etc. It will be a travesty if the game is on in the morning because of the redneck races." That is what I consider intolerant, insulting and ignorant. Mostly ignorant.

Curling is considered a sport, an Olympic one in fact...and it looks easier than baking. I've no clue where baking stands on the list of toughest household jobs, but if I'm making the list it's well ahead of sweeping. How 'bout horse racing? It's the sport of kings right? And the twenty-four and a half pound guys on top of those half-ton horses are the very definition of 'along for the ride'. Still, it's considered a sport. NASCAR is a sport. It's not a game, but it is a sport. Football of course is a sport, but it's a game...best one on the planet if you ask me. Not all games are sports, but by the same token not all sports are games. And congrats to Foppa for not being a bigot! Intolerant, insulting and ignorant generalizations of a group of people is universally considered not predjudiced if you are fairly certain the people you are talking about have the same skin color as you! Well Done!

First of all I totally agree, this should be a night game, and as both a Husker fan and a NASCAR fan, I'd watch the Nebraska game without even thinking twice. It's going to be hard to watch the race anyway since I'll be at the game. But nationaly man, there isn't a regular season football game in the country that could get close to the same advertising revenue numbers a cup race puts up. I have no idea for sure but my guess is that the revenue from a college football game probably wouldn't even cover a network's production costs for a race weekend, but their advertising from that weekend does. Look at this way; When a network/s cover a NASCAR "race" they have coverage of up to three different races that weekend, qualifying for those three races, and practices, plus pre/post race productions for all. So you're looking at around twenty or more hours of live coverage on a given weekend...and I can guarantee you over half of that coverage is advertising. So, my guess is they won't bump the Cup race, but I've been wrong before.

3rd and ten with a couple of minutes to go, down by 2 deep inside your own end and you call a bomb down the middle. Definately boo worthy.

Possibly the funniest thing I've read today.

Like anything else it can be fun in moderation. A friend of mine and I do it every year, we put a certain amount in an on-line account - ususally like 100 dollars - and see who has the most at the end of the year. We put a 10 dollar cap on each game (well, 11 actually but you see my point) To the question, yes, sort of. I've bet NU against the spread. If I think NU will win, but not necessarily win by 30 points for example, I don't really consider that betting 'against' them. And if they do happen to cover some ungodly point spread, so much the better.

I'm not disagreeing with you at all, they had a great line back when they were a running back factory..not everyone in the NFL was in love with some of their blocking techniques but that's another argument for another day. I guess my only point is had you asked the Packers in 97 who they'd rather face in the Denver's backfield for the Superbowl Vaughn Hebron or Terell Davis, they'd probably have opted for Hebron, even though he played behind the same line. That's it. Also during that time Denver had guys like Elway, Smith, Sharpe and McCaffrey for def coords to worry about too. If a team's number one guy is out, you hope you can take advantage. But, as someone else pointed out, the real threat with VT is Taylor. He needs to be contained.

Huh? An average back behind an outstanding line looks like an average back. An outstanding back behind an average line looks like an outstanding back. Yes, a steady O line is a big part of any running game, but to say that because you have a good line a coach can put anyone with cleats on back there and get the same results as his number one guy is just wrong. There is this team in the NFL called the Denver Broncos under Shanahan, you should look up some of their RB that no one had heard of that ran for 1000 yards b/c they had the best OL in football. The OL is absolutely the most important thing, hands down. You can be as great as you want, if there aren't any holes to run through what the hell are you going to do? Yeah, Terrell Davis, Olandis Gary, Mike Anderson..Portis.. no talent there to be sure.

Huh? An average back behind an outstanding line looks like an average back. An outstanding back behind an average line looks like an outstanding back. Yes, a steady O line is a big part of any running game, but to say that because you have a good line a coach can put anyone with cleats on back there and get the same results as his number one guy is just wrong. I took it to mean, "If you have a crap O-line, it doesn't matter much who you have back there. If there are no holes, there are no holes. If you get lit up in the backfield, chances are you're usually not going to get away. If you have a great O-line, you'll obviously do even better with a great RB, but you can have a middle of the pack RB and still maintain something of a running game behind a great O-line." Obviously if you put the towelboy in, you're not going to get much in the way of results no matter what. But let's face it, most I-A RB's are not towelboys. The part in blue is exactly what I meant. And, Virginia Tech does pretty much reload along the OL. Fair enough, I get what you're saying. I still think though that average is average. Every RB at Va Tech lines up behind the same O line, there's a reason one of em was at the top of the depth chart, my guess he's better than the other guys. Take him out and it's an advantage to whoever they're playing. Probably not a game changer, but who kows. Going into that stadium we'll take whatever edge we can get.

Huh? An average back behind an outstanding line looks like an average back. An outstanding back behind an average line looks like an outstanding back. Yes, a steady O line is a big part of any running game, but to say that because you have a good line a coach can put anyone with cleats on back there and get the same results as his number one guy is just wrong.

Great Vince, now we're gonna have those PETA a$$ h*&es all over us.

Amen.