Elf

When did this change? June 2016 Ahh, must have been part of the law that changed the rules on medical cards. I missed that, thanks. I've been giving incorrect information to tourists.

When did this change?

I wouldn't want to be in any conference that includes Texas.

I live in Aurora. I'm guessing you don't know much about our Cannibis laws. Someone with a medical card can buy/possess up to two ounces at a time. Folks from out of State can buy but are limited to a quarter of an ounce at one time. (Approx 7 grams)

So they can buy better weed...? I mean really, if Stanley paid only $100 for about 3/4 ounce, that's virtually Nebraska ditchweed. Sorry, I'm making somewhat light of this. I think it's ridiculous that is a felony but I also am very disappointed that so many of these young men fail to see what's more important and keep their priorities straight. If you really want to be a winner, then act like one. L O L I've been thinking this all day! If he only paid $100 for that weed it is absolutely brick schwag! I'm a college professor. I assume all of my students are on weed until they prove otherwise. If you don't smoke weed in college what are you doing? Quit wasting your life and make some bad decisions already!! The meathead athletes where I teach like to get drunk and beat up other students. That sucks bad.....but it is OK cause muscles and testosterone and stuff! Weed, though......bad choices, irresponsible, not a leader. Wrong. There is a dispensary less than a mile from where I live that sells an ounce for $95 that tests out at 24% THC.

It's not even an ounce.

Just make sure it's good scotch and not some cheap crap like Johnny Walker Red...heh... Glenlevit on the shelf currently, maybe some Chivas. Have you tried The McCallen 12 yr? Or Ben Nevis? I have not When you pour the McCallen, cut it with a couple drops of water, that makes it much smoother and it really brings out all the flavors. Ben Nevis, no such need because it just might be the smoothest whisky I've ever tried.

Well, 6 of 7 makes it hard to argue against that...painful, I know... Wisconsin owned Bo Pelini, I'm not ready to concede any ownage of the current staff. It's 2-0 but a slim 2-0. I'd say that's fair.

Well, 6 of 7 makes it hard to argue against that...painful, I know...

Just make sure it's good scotch and not some cheap crap like Johnny Walker Red...heh... Glenlevit on the shelf currently, maybe some Chivas. Have you tried The McCallen 12 yr? Or Ben Nevis?

It's just my opinion, but I think he's good enough to play in the pros. Size and speed isn't everything, if it was Steve Largent wouldn't be in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. I'm thinking its his durability that is his limiting factor. In regards to the bold? Man, who can ever forget that behind the back catch? Isn't that the one that first had people calling him Westercatch? He certainly made more than his share of outstanding catches during his tenure here. ...Northwestern Hail Mary? An excellent example.

He was pointing out our history with Wisconsin and even said.... So yeah, I'm pretty sure we all know TA is no longer our quarterback... Then he should know it's irrelevant to what the team does in the future don't you think? It's not necessarily irrelevant, as stated before, we've lost 6 out of the last 7 to Wisconsin. That's with 2 different quarterbacks and 2 different coaching staffs. Granted we haven't gotten blown out by Wisconsin with this staff but we haven't exactly proven we can beat the Badgers either. The difference is: 2011-2014 Bo Pelini Coach Taylor Martinez/Tommy Armstrong Quarterbacks 1-3 record, (1 17 point comeback win-3 total blowouts) 2015-2016 Mike Riley Coach Tommy Armstrong Quarterback 0-2 Record (1 game losing FG, 1 Overtime loss) 2017 Mike Riley Coach Tanner Lee Quarterback I'm agreeing with you far more than him. Again, I just understand where he's coming from and how he got there because...he posted it. He'll come around if we start beating the Badgers.

If Diaco comes through on the 3-4 and the O-Line plays well, we could end up with a very good record. Maybe even just one or two losses to Ohio St and maybe Penn St.

He was pointing out our history with Wisconsin and even said.... So yeah, I'm pretty sure we all know TA is no longer our quarterback... Then he should know it's irrelevant to what the team does in the future don't you think? It's not necessarily irrelevant, as stated before, we've lost 6 out of the last 7 to Wisconsin. That's with 2 different quarterbacks and 2 different coaching staffs. Granted we haven't gotten blown out by Wisconsin with this staff but we haven't exactly proven we can beat the Badgers either. Our last drive in the last 2 games against them could've won the game both times. Also you're comparing 2 QBs who were recruited to be run first to a QB who is pass first and judging those 2 QBs on their weaknesses to make an argument against the current QBs strength saying nothing will change. For the most part, I'm in agreement with you. All I'm saying is I understand where he's coming from and how he got to that point. And where he's coming from isn't necessarily bad, he's simply looking at our history. He'll come around as soon as we start winning.

He was pointing out our history with Wisconsin and even said.... So yeah, I'm pretty sure we all know TA is no longer our quarterback... Then he should know it's irrelevant to what the team does in the future don't you think? It's not necessarily irrelevant, as stated before, we've lost 6 out of the last 7 to Wisconsin. That's with 2 different quarterbacks and 2 different coaching staffs. Granted we haven't gotten blown out by Wisconsin with this staff but we haven't exactly proven we can beat the Badgers either.