Your reasoning is flawed; the basic question to be asked is "what are the rules" and the rules were in fact followed as they should have been. Your questioning whether the replay is used to check the accuracy of the clock stoppageon every play is like asking if referees use replay to spot the ball ON EVERY DOWN...of course they don't, because in the flow of the game that would be ridiculous and everyone understands this. Conversely, on the LAST PLAY OF THE GAME, when a decision on when to stop the clock very likely decides the outcome of a game, you can and in fact should review . Apart from this, referees have the authority to add and subtract seconds at any point during the game, irrespective of replay.
In my column, I never argued if the call was correct. The problem arises when you use rules only sometimes when it advantages or disadvantageous another. Rules not uniformly applied will always get you in trouble in a court of law because it screams discrimination.
My latest book, “The Economics of Sex,” is now available on Amazon.
www.fruitbatbooks.com
This has probably already been posted, but it's a good article about how the rules are NOT uniformly enforced.
http://omaha.com/article/20091208/BIGRED/712089842/0/bigred
Same way you they don't drag out the chains to measure 2nd and 7 but they do if a first down is at stake.
I find your example lacking. On second and 7 its empirical that its not a first down. The proper comparison would be if its fourth and an inch and the entire game on close measurements the officials brought out the sticks but on the last time at the end of the game they did not bring out the sticks and guessed thus not applying the rule uniformly. That's what happend.
My latest book, “The Economics of Sex,” is now available on Amazon.
www.fruitbatbooks.com