How could you put VY in front of Frazier? Regardless of your allegiance to Husker Nation, Frazier >>>> Vince Young.
That's fine if you think so, but I don't. One more national championship is certainly a big deal and deserves recognition, but that's really the only edge I give to Tommie Frazier (don't get me wrong, I love the guy). Vince Young had ~1000 more career rushing yards, 2,000 more career passing yards, a better win-loss percentage as a starter, in addition to being a hell of a better passer. He also did this with an incompetent gameday coaching staff and far less talent (could be used as an argument against by saying it inflated his stats being the whole team, or for by saying that he had to work that much harder).
Just my opinion. I look at players as objectively as I can when I measure how good they were compared to others, and whether they played for Nebraska has nothing to do with that.
Dude Tommie lost 3 games in his career 2 as a Freshman one on a severely sprained ankle when the team had come down with a huge case of the flu against ISU and one to FSU in the Orange Bowl, then one again to MNC FSU in the Orange Bowl as a Sophomore where NU was clearly screwed by terrible calls, Mark Wicker the respected sports writer from the Orange County Register in CA said after Tommie and the Huskers went undefeated for their 2nd straight National Championship in January of 1996 "it should be a 3 peat, they'll find Jimmy Hoffa and a cure for the common cold before they find that clip on the punt return in the 1994 Orange Bowl" Repeating as Nat'l Champs is all that needs to be said, it's happened 3 times in the last 40 years and only once in the last 30. Vince Young is not in that class, IMHO.