*** The Official UCLA Game Discussion Thread ***

Grab your pickets, fellow Husker fans, and join me in this noble and necessary campaign.

MOAR ZONE READ!

LESS OPTION!
default_yeah.gif


 
I disagree with Gus Johnson by the way. Yeah, Turner might have caught the ball with more focus, but it would not have made a difference. He'd have fallen down in the process of making that catch. He was running across the middle of the field and that ball went behind him.

Maybe if he does better at stopping on a dime and adjusting back to get it, he'd have it. But there's no way he would have had a first down.*

*-I suppose with Turner, you technically don't know. Maybe he could have danced around for 10 more seconds and gotten there eventually
default_laugh.png


In seriousness though, he would've been tackled right away. Taylor needs to throw that ball in front of him, lead the receiver. When it's third down and you throw short of the sticks, you have to enable YAC. Turner was looking for that YAC, but the ball wasn't placed there. It happens sometimes, I wouldn't rake either player over the coals for it. Taylor had plenty of pressure.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In all fairness, we had jack and s**t for film on this team. Kinda hard to prepare for them, and UCLA does have talent...talent that Neweasal never unlocked or unleashed.
didn't we use that excuse last week?
Valid then, too. We made some good second-half adjustments...but then again, Southern Miss doesn't have near the amount of wasted/languishing talent that UCLA has.

Unrealized talent + new coach + no film for opposition to study = nightmare.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top