FriendlyLurker2007
Five-Star Recruit
Stave will be in the grave after this one...btw Wiscy on BTN right now lol :wasted
Last edited by a moderator:
If this defense isn't used to going against a fast paced offense with speed it's the coach's fault. They have the opportunity to go against one every day in practice.I see what you are saying, I also think that it could be something that hurts us too. Playing the level of ISU, they are slow and will be nothing like the athletes of wisconsin. So hopefully we didn't become acclimated to that pace of play and come out and get punched in the mouth against wisky. Obviously it's a stretch, but I think you understand my logic.One thing I just thought of....
Having such a low opponent in ISU could be a big benefit for us. Sure, we game planned for them and I'm sure the coaches didn't have the team overlooking them, but I guarantee that the coaches were game planning for WI this last week more so than when we play a more quality opponent.
Couple that w the fact we added a few wrinkles on offense that we probably won't use againt WI, just to make them prepare for it, take up their practice time.
Its like we got an extra couple days of prep work because of the sched. This could be an advantage for us.
Exactly. We were bigger stronger and faster. Same as we were against SDS. But we didnt make numerous mistakes to keep them in the game long enough to give them hope to carry througout. We came out focused and crushed'em right away and it was all over after the 1st quarter. Then we coasted.If we struggled against Idaho State I would of had concerns. This wasn't a South Dakota State game, we came out and beat them like we should have. I'm completely sure we will be focused on Wisconsin and come out with a "W"
Good ole' Wisconsinfan77 the racist.I was lurking on a Wisky board and came across this.Posted: 9/16/2012 12:24 PM
RE: Nebraska game and B1G
Nebraska is not "tough to stop" they are eerily similar to Utah sts O with keeton.
Lots of outside handoffs, pitches,and zone reads.
We stopped it last year we will stop it this year.
If u haven't noticed yet. UW's rush D is fantastic.
I don't see Nebraska getting over 150 yards as a team.
The offense is the problem right now.
But I see our runnning game improving against UTEP and
Getting after that crapy front 7 from Nebraska in Lincoln.
Can't wait.
I think we might be able to run the ball better than this gentleman envisioned. If we are held to less than 150 yards rushing, we're hosed.
Interesting take on whats to come...
Yeah, tracked down some of his other "musings", and he's a gem...Good ole' Wisconsinfan77 the racist.I was lurking on a Wisky board and came across this.Posted: 9/16/2012 12:24 PM
RE: Nebraska game and B1G
Nebraska is not "tough to stop" they are eerily similar to Utah sts O with keeton.
Lots of outside handoffs, pitches,and zone reads.
We stopped it last year we will stop it this year.
If u haven't noticed yet. UW's rush D is fantastic.
I don't see Nebraska getting over 150 yards as a team.
The offense is the problem right now.
But I see our runnning game improving against UTEP and
Getting after that crapy front 7 from Nebraska in Lincoln.
Can't wait.
I think we might be able to run the ball better than this gentleman envisioned. If we are held to less than 150 yards rushing, we're hosed.
Interesting take on whats to come...
He got banned from the BRR board (Nebraska Scout site), and created an alias.Yeah, tracked down some of his other "musings", and he's a gem...Good ole' Wisconsinfan77 the racist.I was lurking on a Wisky board and came across this.Posted: 9/16/2012 12:24 PM
RE: Nebraska game and B1G
Nebraska is not "tough to stop" they are eerily similar to Utah sts O with keeton.
Lots of outside handoffs, pitches,and zone reads.
We stopped it last year we will stop it this year.
If u haven't noticed yet. UW's rush D is fantastic.
I don't see Nebraska getting over 150 yards as a team.
The offense is the problem right now.
But I see our runnning game improving against UTEP and
Getting after that crapy front 7 from Nebraska in Lincoln.
Can't wait.
I think we might be able to run the ball better than this gentleman envisioned. If we are held to less than 150 yards rushing, we're hosed.
Interesting take on whats to come...
It's shocking how much Wisconsin's offense plummeted since last year. Shocking and mildly humorous. :lol:The biggest concern is our rush defense vs. their rush offense. We're ranked 86th nationally in rush defense, our only major Achilles' heel. The tale of the tape:
Nebraska
Category - National Rank (Conference Rank)
Rush Offense - 5 (1)
Pass Efficiency Offense - 10 (1)
Total Offense - 9 (1)
Scoring Offense - 8 (1)
Rush Defense - 86 (11)
Pass Efficiency Defense - 23 (4)
Total Defense - 51 (8)
Scoring Defense - 39 (9)
Wisconsin
Category - National Rank (Conference Rank)
Rush Offense - 86 (11)
Pass Efficiency Offense - 63 (8)
Total Offense - 110 (12)
Scoring Offense - 100 (10)
Rush Defense - 13 (3)
Pass Efficiency Defense - 59 (10)
Total Defense - 31 (5)
Scoring Defense - 33 (6)
I'm a little surprised to see their rush offense so low-ranked, but I think a lot of that has to do with Ball being dinged up. White is a more-than-capable replacement, and there's still every chance Ball plays anyway. I think our best bet in this game is to stack the box, sell out vs. the run, and try to put them in third-and-long, then kill whichever QB they put in the pocket.
Look at their stats through four games, and against so-so competition (#45 SOS) they don't rank in the top 25 in any category except Rush Defense.
Sell out against the run, keep a weather eye on Jared Abbrederis, and we should be able to outscore them.