I would also say this is an assumption that can't be proven or disproven. Every single week we see plenty of college teams come out and struggle with, or lose to, inferior opponents. Many times there is no good explanation for why it happens, it just does. Did the coaches suddenly forget how to properly coach on that week? Probably not. So who is to say that doesn't play a role for some players or teams?All he's saying is that this negative criticism doesn't play a factor at all (or if it does, it's negligible) in the outcome of games.
Never dismissed it; if it is part of the equation it goes along with numerous other factors, some of which are inherently more important (like not throwing picks) whatever contribution negative criticism uniquely adds is very small.I would also say this is an assumption that can't be proven or disproven. Every single week we see plenty of college teams come out and struggle with, or lose to, inferior opponents. Many times there is no good explanation for why it happens, it just does. Did the coaches suddenly forget how to properly coach on that week? Probably not. So who is to say that doesn't play a role for some players or teams?All he's saying is that this negative criticism doesn't play a factor at all (or if it does, it's negligible) in the outcome of games.
I think dismissing it out of hand is rather naive.
Except what you are doing is dismissing it as "very small" or, in other words, negligible. That's dismissing it. The problem is, you're far over simplifying the human psyche, especially at that age.Never dismissed it; if it is part of the equation it goes along with numerous other factors, some of which are inherently more important (like not throwing picks) whatever contribution negative criticism uniquely adds is very small.
To the bold: Believe me. I know I'm not.Except what you are doing is dismissing it as "very small" or, in other words, negligible. That's dismissing it. The problem is, you're far over simplifying the human psyche, especially at that age.Never dismissed it; if it is part of the equation it goes along with numerous other factors, some of which are inherently more important (like not throwing picks) whatever contribution negative criticism uniquely adds is very small.
Edit - And we're not just talking about normal negative criticism here, let's be clear. This is stuff like people ripping into Bell on a personal level because he dropped some balls during a game or two. Dismissing that showing up on a person's Twitter account as having no chance at making a significant impact on a person's subconscious is what is naive.
That was apparent long ago.We're going to have to agree to disagree
whats the name of this LSU one?That would be the infamous tidefans.com.Ohhhhhh... which one?! I have never been banned before! LOLWell there is that one Bamy site where you cannot say ANYTHING bad about Bamy/players/Bear Bryant or else you get immediately banned.The husker fan base is more tame than most.. all fan bases have these boards and all of them say positive and negative things.... dont take it offensively.. that is part of the game.
Some of their rules:
![]()
![]()
LSU fans were banned following Bama's 2011 6-9 OT loss to the Tigers and are still banned some 26 months later.
![]()
But it's not as if fans of other teams are really allowed either. It's the largest sunshine pump I've seen on the internet.
I find it interesting how message boards can in some ways reflect the general culture...or stereotyped culture...of a school's fans. Bama's largest board is huge, crazy and isolationist. LSU's largest board has devolved into a hugely successful arena for throw downs between fans from across the SEC while Kansas State's is just one gigantic vulgar troll board.