Literally an exposition of opinion passed as fact.
I realized I didn't need that part since you ignored the latter part of my post, which was not opinion. It is useful as a reminder to not get so excited and overly verbose. I stand by my main point, which is fact: Including HS, Tommy had more snaps playing QB under his belt than Taylor did as a redshirt freshman. Don't underestimate his four years of HS QB experience to Taylor's one.This is a bet for sure, but one I'm confident in making. He'll have a more advanced QB acumen by the time he leaves than Taylor did. We watched Taylor learn the position in real-time, my bet is that we won't have to do so with Tommy anywhere close to as long as we did Taylor.
Thank you. It's funny how quickly people forgot Taylor was being talked about for a Heisman prior to his Sophmore year, but injuries put a stop to that quickly.
I'd rather take a competent QB than a confident one. Numbers don't lie, freshman to freshman numbers show Martinez was better.
Maybe Armstrong makes a huge jump and becomes the QB we hope he can be. As of now he has proven nothing.
You're not disproving my point, the Heisman is a popularity contest heavily weighted towards whoever produces sexier highlight reels. I highly doubt Tommy will ever sniff Heisman consideration or come close to matching Taylor's stats, we don't need him to. Our team strategy is designed for strong defense and ball-control run game. All he has to do is become better at limiting mistakes and calculating risk, and in that department he is further along than Taylor was at that time. And I'm betting he will learn it quicker and do a better job at it than Taylor did. I know he hasn't proven it yet, but the more nuanced observations of his decision making (ex. his habit of overthrowing receivers, knowing when to take a sack) make me bullish on his development.