NUpolo8
Banned
Yeah these Illinois and Rutgers games were way better than playing a Heisman QB and a Heisman finalist QB, let alone two BCS teams.They may very well have been good or just as good. But Ill stand by this. I dont think either one would have won either division the last three years had we all not left.no one is saying they would be winning the conference every year (because, you know, that would be impossible). but they would still be good teams.God awful Bo Pelini record against K State: 3-0, against Baylor 2-0.ksu and baylor have great coaches, both programs were on the upswing while we were in the conference. i think the conference would look better with us in there, but i think those teams would be doing just as well.Ok Polo. I guess your pompous attitude is free to translate my words into whatever makes your crusade feel worthy.
Kansas State and Baylor have been quite successful in the three years since 4 teams they played on a yearly/bi yearly base defected. Now they miss out on playing a conference title game and AND get to play Texas at its lowest point in YEARS.
But yes Im sure its somehow Just a coincidence that they are better now that the league is easier to win.
Perhaps they were on an upswing. Doesnt make it any easier to win with all 4 teams still around. Kstate would still be playing Nebraska, Mizzou and Colorado for division rights, Baylor playing Texas A&M
At The time we considered them no better than beating a Rutgers or Illinois. Now that we cant play and demolish them on the field they are suddenly lucrative matchups we would want to watch? Our schedule ended up being pretty light in the middle this year but we cant change that. Last three games can make it all better hopefully.
I mean seriously? At the very least we'd know where we stand as a team.