Isn't Davis considered one of the most promising hires on the staff?
There is "promise" and there are results. Look at the collegiate offenses and skill players Ron Brown had a hand in coaching over the years...
...now do the same for Davis.
Now, which one looks more successful, judging by the results in most every way that they can be measured?
Really guys, how many gallons of Kool-Aid does one have to chug to ignore what we have seen in Brown's 24 years as a coach so you can buy into the notion that someone being labeled as "promising" is an upgrade?
You guys can have the last word on this one.