Long ago against Miami, Nebraska kept running the ball when they were down 14 points halfway through the fourth quarter. Fourth down and 8 was a running play that went for a TD...then Osborne went to a pass play to win it, and didn't...Hard to run the ball when you're down by 17 points in the first quarter.
I'm not a big stats guy but I use to watch a lot of Thursday night and Late Late Saturday games.Bowfin said:Mike Riley is a work in progress. I don't think he has ever had a team where running the ball was a path to success, so he really can't comprehend it working on a regular basis.
Someone needs to clue him in on that.
that Steven Jackson guy was pretty good also.I'm not a big stats guy but I use to watch a lot of Thursday night and Late Late Saturday games.Bowfin said:Mike Riley is a work in progress. I don't think he has ever had a team where running the ball was a path to success, so he really can't comprehend it working on a regular basis.
Someone needs to clue him in on that.
It seemed like Jacquez (spelling?) Rodgers was a huge part of the OSU offense for several years. He was literally the go to guy.
That's been Nebraska's recipe for success in recent years, but, there's some combination of scheme, talent and performance that's preventing us from really utilizing the ground game in an effective way.HuskerfaninOkieland said:It just seems when the offense is able to move the ball on the ground effectively, throwing the ball sparingly to keep the defense honest, the Huskers tend to have more success. At least that's how it appears to meMavric said:Just for comparison, last year Ameer averaged 6.5 yards per carry against Miami. Today Newby averaged 5.9. That's not a huge difference. But Ameer got 21 more carries last year than Newby got this year.
Speaking to HuskerfaninOkieland's point, It's also quite possible that if you give a guy more carries, the bigger plays are more likely to show up. This year we ran it 41% of the time against Miami. Last year it was 80%. Some of that had to do with how the game unfolded no doubt. But that's quite the disparity.
A couple comments on this. Not necessarily directed at you as I've seen similar comments elsewhere.Newby averaged 5.9 YPC against Miami, which is great and exactly what you'd like to see out of your running back. The problem, at least in my opinion, is he's not great in open space or making the first guy miss. I also don't think there's much blocking going on at the second level because our line is struggling at the point of attack.
Combine this with drive killing penalties, and dropped passes, and the offense sputters. As I've said in another thread, the offense was extremely balanced by the time we were part way through the third quarter - 28 passes and 28 runs. Our run game definitely isn't for a lack of trying.
Gotta love that 3rd and 1 in the second quarter when instead of maybe lining up with Cross who had just finished a nice run before back there or any running back really back there to get the 1 yard they needed for the first down they decide it's best to try and pass instead. Queue the punter.Bowfin said:Mike Riley is a work in progress. I don't think he has ever had a team where running the ball was a path to success, so he really can't comprehend it working on a regular basis.
Someone needs to clue him in on that.
So do we throw out Reilly's 41 yard catch and Morgan's 33 yard catch and say we only threw for 235 yards on the game?Newby broke two big runs, 14 and 23 yards. That's how he got almost 6 yards per carry.
At the start of the third quarter we were down 27-3. 8 non-QB runs rest of the way (including Newby runs of 9 and 14 yards in the midst of all this passing)...and 30 points scored. So, yeah, I find this idea that the run was doing better against Miami to be very puzzling.