Landlord
Banned
It's an interesting thought experiment - if today's landscape of college football makes it essentially impossible to do things "the right way" (however you view that, I guess, but maybe more importantly for discussion the way it's determined by Nebraska's athletic department's mission statement - INTEGRITY - TRUST - RESPECT - TEAMWORK - LOYALTY), which do you want to sacrifice?
That's a little bit too dichotomous of a question, though, so I've tried to phrase the poll in a way that provides a little more nuance. When given the choice between extremes, most would pick "the right way" over success, as, I think, we should. However, every season it's the same story - harsh criticism, complaining, frustration and bitterness that we aren't like programs X & Y - even though in any other conversation where we aren't measuring ourselves to them, we like to talk about how programs X & Y are dirty, cheaters, scumbags, lacking integrity, etc.
Well, you don't get to have your cake and eat it too, folks, so what's the priority and to what degree are you comfortable sacrificing for on-the-field success?
That's a little bit too dichotomous of a question, though, so I've tried to phrase the poll in a way that provides a little more nuance. When given the choice between extremes, most would pick "the right way" over success, as, I think, we should. However, every season it's the same story - harsh criticism, complaining, frustration and bitterness that we aren't like programs X & Y - even though in any other conversation where we aren't measuring ourselves to them, we like to talk about how programs X & Y are dirty, cheaters, scumbags, lacking integrity, etc.
Well, you don't get to have your cake and eat it too, folks, so what's the priority and to what degree are you comfortable sacrificing for on-the-field success?
Last edited by a moderator: