No, there's almost no conclusion you can draw beyond circumstantial posturing. It's a clumsy take..no conclusion or connection from pictures to field play..? Really..? The pictures absolutely reflect gameplay..sloppy, lazy, attitude..ect
If we're going to talk about the importance of S&C in general and Nebraska's need to get back to a dominant o-line, have at it. If we're going to post pictures of players and make inane statements about their muscle composition, then this thread is heading for a swift lock. Time to make a choice.
Last edited by a moderator: