we paid Riley off with a lump sum so all of us that thought it was a sham were slightly mistaken considering his 50k salary had nothing to do with his oregon state salary correct? or am I stupid?If Nebraska didn’t sue mike Riley for his sham of 50 k salary at Oregon state they aren’t suing bo pelini. Riley had lowest salary in d1
when I asked moos about this on a radio show he said that they had budgeted for Riley making no money to defer the number we owed him and that it was “taken care of”
nu has decided that they are just going to eat these things to avoid any bad publicity
pelinis salary is in pretty much in line with others in his role
rileys was not at all
I’m sure both were trying to stick it to nu
but Riley’s was far more egregious
No you are correctGlad we got Bo paid off, but i dont see the ill will for him. He might of had some nasty parting words when he left, but i cant fault him for being upset if it was justified or not. I honestly think MIke Riley and Bill Callahan did alot more to hurt this program than Bo ever did. Both of those two coaches did alot more to alter the way we did things around here than Bo did. Probably not the most popular opinion but its how i see it.
Your article is wrong....it states we made payments which is standard but incorrect as we paid him his lump sum instead of the monthly payments.Not true
smilin mike gamed the system big time
https://www.omaha.com/huskers/blogs/nebraska-still-on-hook-for-most-of-mike-riley-s/article_4d33da16-f7d5-11e7-9346-a3861c967347.html
they couldn't cultivate an elite talent at the QB position (Martinez had elite flashes but was plagued by turnovers, and TA was really good but not great)
What Bo should do is take a Defensive Coordinator position at a D1 school. Good money, doing what he's best suited for, and it gets him out of the front line of all those interviews.
Well, they will quickly find out what we found out for 3 years. Careful what you wish for.
Don't get me wrong, we needed a change. But it took a long time for that change to pay off, actually still awaiting the pay off.
I was uncomfortable with the change at the time, and though it's worked out now (by getting Frost), I still think it was the wrong move. If you're going to fire a coach who wins 9-10 games every year, you better have a home run hire coming in, not a library card carrying Mr. Rogers in oversized sweats.
This, I think, is true.That's just it, Eichorst was hired to fire Bo Pelini. The idiot's who hired him didn't think any further than that. They just assumed he would hire another guy who could win 9 or 10 or maybe more with some luck. But as I've been trying to explain elsewhere, the AD job of hiring coaches isn't as easy as some people think. Eichorst wanted Bielma and almost had him. He got played in the end. So, with no backup choice in mind he found Mike Riley.
A better AD would have established a better relationship with the current coach from the get go and the whole mess maybe never happens. But Bo had been souring people on his attitude, you can't act like Nick Saban and get blown out like Mike Riley it turns out.