Gun Control

Moiraine said:
He makes that accusation in every thread.
Click to expand...


hqdefault.jpg


 
BigRedBuster said:
I must have missed something.  I don't remember name calling in this thread.
Click to expand...


If you question his sources, you're questioning him, and by his logic, calling him names...

...when in actuality, we're only impugning his integrity due to his consistent use of morally questionable bankrupt news sources. 

 
deedsker said:
Where there is geopolitical concerns to take into consideration with multinational armies from multiple sides taking part. 

Usually when the government comes for its' own people, civilian casualties are of low priority. 
Click to expand...
Since your confused, I would guess Turkey and Russia's involvement, as well as Kurdish forces, has more to do with slow progress against ISIS and the ability of them to hang on as it isn't us versus them alone. Everyone has a piece of their stakes in any given decision and, if someone steps on the wrong foot, now you are an enemy to what should be your ally or frienemy. 

But yes, by all means guerrilla warfare will surely stop any oppressive force all the time and there is no way civilians would suffer for it. /s

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess this is one way to try to get people to not talk about what you have been doing. 

Since one showed the public the NDA, I’m assuming it’s not going to work. 

Read the thread. 


 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top