Iowa is losing a lot of players. If there was a year where we can get that monkey off our back against them it would be 2020.All i ask for is beating either Wisconsin or Iowa and making a bowl game.
Iowa is losing a lot of players. If there was a year where we can get that monkey off our back against them it would be 2020.
Yeah Minny's defense will regress. Their offense will still be damn good though which is what killed us last year. We need to play sideline to sideline against them, but them losing Johnson is big. For Iowa, Wirfs and Epenesa would be crazy to return considering where they are projected, but crazier things have happened. Replacing Stanley will be tough for them, kid is tough and the definition of an Iowa QB who has annoyed us these past years.The only crazy scenario is if for some reason Epenesa and Wirfs both come back, but I don't know why they would. And even then, replacing a 3 year starter at QB is difficult. They're always going to be solid, but definitely taking a step back next year.
One thing I'm curious about next year is how losing Tyler Johnson/Rodney Smith/Shannon Brooks affects Minnesota. Obviously they still have Bateman and Ibrahim, but I'm wondering if it will be a little like Spielman this year - they'll still get their numbers, but the offense as a whole could suffer from fewer options. But they do like some of the younger receivers, and I wouldn't actually predict regression with those 2, a returning QB, and the whole OL coming back. Defense could be a different story, particularly if Winfield leaves. Pretty much the whole starting DL/LB core is leaving.
The only way you see 6-6 as our ceiling next year is if you assume the absolute worst case scenario for Nebraska, and the best case scenarios for every other team. And I get it, the past couple years/decades have made that easier to do. But seriously, no hope for you guys at all? Would you say you enjoy being Nebraska fans?
Heads will roll if we go 3-9.Looking at the past few years I can see us going 3-9, with 5-7 expected.......Recruiting is better for sure, but we still have yet to show our "better" recruiting on the field.....Hope 2020 brings the revival of NU football.
Heads will roll if we go 3-9.
I agree. That schedule looks pretty tough. Throw in losing the starting DL, LB, CB and the D is a rebuild to a degree. I've given up on the addition by subtraction argument.... New receivers that will hopefully step up, new OL positions (possibly) and we are in the "we are young", "wait until we develop depth" mode......We completely blew the 4 game RS rule so besides guys who actually started, we developed little to no depth this year IMHO. A lot of guys looking to get their first starts next year. Against that schedule.....Heads will roll if we go 3-9.
I agree. That schedule looks pretty tough. Throw in losing the starting DL, LB, CB and the D is a rebuild to a degree. I've given up on the addition by subtraction argument.... New receivers that will hopefully step up, new OL positions (possibly) and we are in the "we are young", "wait until we develop depth" mode......We completely blew the 4 game RS rule so besides guys who actually started, we developed little to no depth this year IMHO. A lot of guys looking to get their first starts next year. Against that schedule.....
I just didn't see anything down the stretch and the stupid losses early on that kept us from going bowling that says we will be better. The recruit class is great for our record, but we continually out recruit the West.....Attrition hits all schools so the ranking balance out in the end.....I just keep thinking that to pull this last class, Frost and Co are sharing a vision/plan that the fans and media are not privy too.
I'm trying to be rational and realistic so still thinking 3-9 wouldn't shock me....
We completely blew the 4 game RS rule so besides guys who actually started, we developed little to no depth this year IMHO.