Injuries are an inherent risk of the sport. Contracting a pandemic level communicable disease while playing a sport that, by it’s nature, is virtually impossible to adhere to well established risk mitigation guidelines is NOT an inherent risk of football. I think that’s the difference here. Sure you could argue that x person wasn’t forced to play, but do you really want to leave it up to a potentially sympathetic jury who is primarily comprised of non-football fans thanks to nifty work by the litigating attorneys?When is the last time a player won a lawsuit after being injured during a game?
The mitigation (social distancing, masks, shutdowns, etc) did not work to stop it
Case counts are going up because the virus continues to spread and never stopped spreading. testing continues to increase as fast as the new cases increase. the shutdown of parts of the economy may have slowed the spread temporarily but only for maybe 30-45 days.Seems like it worked pretty well until everyone stopped doing those things
Seems like it worked pretty well until everyone stopped doing those things
wearing a mask is not the problem nor the solution. But it makes some people feel better because they are doing something and gives them a false sense of safety. The “experts” say it reduces the probability of infection by about 2%. Even the Great Fauci said masks are almost useless. But if it makes people feel better, fine. Very little downside to them. I am all for masks if the result is we start living again. Open things up and treat those who do get sick. Its not a matter of if everyone gets it, just when.People liked their freedom (whatever that means?) more than wearing a mask, so we're spiking again while other nations are returning to relatively normal lives.
All these "freedom" lovers are going to cost us college football.
Wear a mask!
wearing a mask is not the problem nor the solution. But it makes some people feel better because they are doing something and gives them a false sense of safety. The “experts” say it reduces the probability of infection by about 2%. Even the Great Fauci said masks are almost useless. But if it makes people feel better, fine. Very little downside to them. I am all for masks if the result is we start living again. Open things up and treat those who do get sick. Its not a matter of if everyone gets it, just when.
What evidence do we have that wearing a mask is effective in preventing COVID-19?
There are several strands of evidence supporting the efficacy of masks.
One category of evidence comes from laboratory studies of respiratory droplets and the ability of various masks to block them. An experiment using high-speed video found that hundreds of droplets ranging from 20 to 500 micrometers were generated when saying a simple phrase, but that nearly all these droplets were blocked when the mouth was covered by a damp washcloth. Another study of people who had influenza or the common cold found that wearing a surgical mask significantly reduced the amount of these respiratory viruses emitted in droplets and aerosols.
But the strongest evidence in favor of masks come from studies of real-world scenarios. “The most important thing are the epidemiologic data,” said Rutherford. Because it would be unethical to assign people to not wear a mask during a pandemic, the epidemiological evidence has come from so-called “experiments of nature.”
A recent study published in Health Affairs, for example, compared the COVID-19 growth rate before and after mask mandates in 15 states and the District of Columbia. It found that mask mandates led to a slowdown in daily COVID-19 growth rate, which became more apparent over time. The first five days after a mandate, the daily growth rate slowed by 0.9 percentage-points compared to the five days prior to the mandate; at three weeks, the daily growth rate had slowed by 2 percentage-points.
Another study looked at coronavirus deaths across 198 countries and found that those with cultural norms or government policies favoring mask-wearing had lower death rates.
Two compelling case reports also suggest that masks can prevent transmission in high-risk scenarios, said Chin-Hong and Rutherford. In one case, a man flew from China to Toronto and subsequently tested positive for COVID-19. He had a dry cough and wore a mask on the flight, and all 25 people closest to him on the flight tested negative for COVID-19. In another case, in late May, two hair stylists in Missouri had close contact with 140 clients while sick with COVID-19. Everyone wore a mask and none of the clients tested positive.
so many people involved with a football team.......i don't see how any team can go through a season without multiple cases/infections.Wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
You want football this Fall? Wear a mask.
Knapplec are you one of those guys that wants to pull the bandaid off slowly?
You are correct about opening things back up. Herd immunity is the only way to get past this although its probably never going away completely. Maybe if there is an effective vaccine, but those generally take years to develop. Things look bad in Arizona, Texas, Florida right now but the reality is they are closer to herd immunity than most and doing it at a time when the weather is less favorable for a virus. I do think masks help some although i wear them more as a courtesy to others and because here IL we are still required to wear them in public. When we are no longer required to wear them I wont wear one.wearing a mask is not the problem nor the solution. But it makes some people feel better because they are doing something and gives them a false sense of safety. The “experts” say it reduces the probability of infection by about 2%. Even the Great Fauci said masks are almost useless. But if it makes people feel better, fine. Very little downside to them. I am all for masks if the result is we start living again. Open things up and treat those who do get sick. Its not a matter of if everyone gets it, just when.