84HuskerLaw
Well-known member
I get the idea but we could use 150 scholarships so maybe find 50 to actually play. The top tier will still get their fill of elite players. The reason we take walkons is to find the rare but vital diamonds in the rough and create good practice stations, drills, competitive rooms etc. Many walkons became 5 star level players. The 93 county ‘scholarships’ brought in a lot of tough, hard workin farm boys historically.@Red Five is correct. The issue with CFB is extreme talent consolidation among the top 7 or so programs in the country. Reducing the scholarship limit by 10 means Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia. etc. can't hoard as much talent. Nearly their entire class is rated 4*s or higher each year. Reducing the scholarship numbers hopefully means more of those players will be spread among the rest of the teams.
I don't know how much this benefits Nebraska, because we're not that high on the lists of most of those kids anyway, but it would help the competitiveness CFB is lacking by giving more talent to the next crop of teams like Michigan, Miami, Oregon, etc. The biggest argument against is that the talent gap is still so significant it wouldn't help close the gap between the Oregon's and the Georgia's enough anyway.
And, let's be honest, programs like Nebraska don't recruit enough talented kids to fill out 85 scholarships anyway. Each of our recruiting classes contain a few "projects" that we gamble on, hoping they turn into solid players.
I don’t see the elite tier teams keeping more than about 85 guys in the days of the portal. There is plenty of PT available for top level talent in Lincoln though.