AZRaiderH8r
Well-known member
You are 100% right. I can't see the owners saying okay to that lost revenue. Instead, they will just roll out a watered down roster. It sucks for the fans. Imagine somehow being a Nugget fan who lives in Minnesota. You buy tickets to see the team in their one visit to your area that season (or one of a few), but because they played the night before and had a tip off 22 hours later (which I thought was against the CBA), you get to see one starter play and a bunch of bench players. It's a bummer.It's not good for the players and so it's not good for the game. There's a pretty simple solution: go back to a 72 game season.
But it's probably not that simple, since it would give up 160 some games a season of arena and TV revenue, and the owners -- even as rich as they are -- would be expected to lower player salaries in return. I just don't think players and agents will see it that way.
I get that this is going to make me sound like an old dude yelling at the neighborhood kids to get off his lawn, but I just don't remember players taking games off in the old days.